Safety and efficacy of a reduced frequency viral monitoring strategy for Epstein‐Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and BK polyomavirus post‐kidney transplant: A quality assurance initiative

Christie Rampersad,William Kong,Chris Wiebe,Robert Balshaw,Jared Bullard,Armelle Perez Cortes Villalobos,Aaron Trachtenberg,James Shaw,Martin Karpinski,Peter W. Nickerson,Julie Ho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15292
2024-03-29
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:Background There is variability in recommended viral monitoring protocols after kidney transplant. In response to increased demand for laboratory testing during the COVID‐19 pandemic, the Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Program updated its monitoring protocols for cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV), and BK polyomavirus (BKV) to a reduced frequency. Methods This single‐center nested case‐control study evaluated 252 adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted from 2015 to 2021, with the updated protocols effective on March 19th 2020. Cases included recipients transplanted after the protocol update who developed CMV, EBV, and BKV DNAemia and were matched to controls with DNAemia transplanted prior to the protocol update. The primary outcome was the difference in maximum DNA load titers between cases and matched controls. Secondary outcomes included time to initial DNAemia detection and DNAemia clearance. Safety outcomes of tissue‐invasive viral disease were described. Results There were 216 recipients transplanted preupdate and 36 recipients postupdate. There was no difference between cases and controls in maximum or first DNA load titers for EBV, CMV, or BKV. Cases experienced earlier EBV DNAemia detection (26 (IQR 8, 32) vs. 434 (IQR 96, 1184) days, p = .005). Median follow‐up was significantly longer for recipients transplanted preupdate (4.3 vs. 1.3 years, p
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?