BK polyomavirus DNAemia, allograft rejection, and de novo donor‐specific antibodies after lowering target tacrolimus levels in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Hou‐Xuan Huang,Yijin Xiang,Roshan George,Pamela Winterberg,Anastacia Serluco,Rochelle Liverman,Inci Yildirim,Rouba Garro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14791
2024-05-31
Pediatric Transplantation
Abstract:Early BKV DNAemia is common post‐pediatric kidney transplant, especially in younger ages, with ~30% incidence within 18 months post‐transplant. Favorable outcomes are achieved with (1) frequent monitoring of viremia and (2) timely reduction of immunosuppressive medications, which must be balanced against risk of rejection and development of HLA antibodies. Background BK polyomavirus (BKV) DNAemia is a challenging infectious complication after kidney transplant (KT). Reduction of immunosuppression is the mainstay of management, and tacrolimus is often the first immunosuppressive medication adjusted upon the diagnosis of BKV DNAemia. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a new institutional protocol with lower target tacrolimus levels on BKV DNAemia, allograft rejection, and de novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSA) among pediatric KT recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all KT episodes between January 2013 and December 2018. The new protocol with lower target tacrolimus levels was implemented in March 2015. One hundred twenty‐seven patients were included in primary analysis. All patients received induction with basiliximab and methylprednisolone and were maintained on a steroid‐based immunosuppressive regimen. Results In the post‐intervention cohort, cumulative incidence of BKV DNAemia at 100 days (13.4% vs. 17.8%, p = .605) and 18 months post‐KT (34.1% vs. 26.7%, p = .504) was not significantly different from the pre‐intervention cohort. Biopsy‐proven rejection rate did not change. However, we observed a trend toward earlier development of dnDSA in the post‐intervention cohort using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log‐rank p = .06). Younger recipient age at the time of transplant was found to slightly increase the risk of BKV DNAemia (OR: 1.09, 95% CI [1.01, 1.16], p = .024). There was an association between BKV DNAemia and biopsy‐proven rejection of any type (adjustedOR: 2.77, 95% CI [1.26, 6.23], p = .012), especially acute T‐cell‐mediated rejection grade 1A and above (adjustedOR: 2.95, 95% CI [1.06, 8.30], p = .037), after adjusted for recipient age at the time of transplant. Conclusions Targeting lower tacrolimus levels did not decrease the incidence of BKV DNAemia within 100 days or 18 months post‐KT, nor did it increase the risk of biopsy‐proven rejection among pediatric KT recipients in our center. However, there was a trend toward earlier development of dnDSA, which may portend worse long‐term graft outcome post‐KT. Our findings highlight the need for individualized immunosuppressive regimens based on immunologic and infectious risk factors and the importance of implementing innovative biomarkers to guide therapy and improve outcomes.
pediatrics,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?