A psychotherapeutic context for clinical trials is promising, but manualization is not.

D. Klein,Lauren B. Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHPSYC.1997.01830220051008
1997-10-01
Archives of General Psychiatry
Abstract:IN THIS issue of theARCHIVES, Carroll 1 argues for a psychotherapeutic context, standardized by manualization, for pharmacotherapy trials. This may well succeed in lowering the attrition rate and improving compliance, 2 but the superiority of detailed manuals over goal-oriented, supportive therapy has not been demonstrated. Therefore, standardization by manuals is premature. THE ADOPTION OF MANUALS Manual-based psychotherapy has become standard in psychotherapy research, to provide a distinct, operationalized, replicable structure. In comparative psychotherapy trials, manuals ensure adequate differentiation between therapies, thus allowing strong statements as to what was actually done. 3,4 However, since it has not been shown that manuals increase the treatment efficacy or diminish outcome variance, their required use See also page 923 compared with manual-free, supportive psychotherapy has not been shown to be necessary. Such a manual requirement may expensively address a nonexistent problem. RESEARCH ON THE EFFICACY OF MANUALS Schulte et al 5 compared the
What problem does this paper attempt to address?