Disposal of small quantities of radioactive materials in local landfills: problems and solutions.

C. Culver,H. Dworkin,A. Forsaith

1993-02-01

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract:in modifying a Los Angeles waste disposal policy. As a result, nuclear medicine diagnostic patient waste was es sentially excluded from detection at Los Angeles landfills. In response to the Detroit area landfill problem, mem bers of the nuclear medicine community chose to work directly with the landfill owner and operators to achieve a detection level acceptable to both parties. The landfill owner allowed two certified medical physi cists to examine the monitoring equipment on-site. The landfill monitor (Bicron Landfill Monitor, Bicron Corp, Newbury, OH) consisted of two sodium iodide (l―x1―) detectors mounted in lead sleeves on opposite sides of the entrance to the landfill property. Each was positioned to sample the trash container at a height of 7 ft above the roadbed. A total distance of 13 ft separated the detectors; however, the location of the detector on the driver's side permitted the trash container to come as close as 2 ft to the detector. Exempt quantities of †̃33Ba (2.9 @sCi) and @°Co (1 .0 MCi) were measured in air between the two detectors. When either source was positioned within 2 ft of either detector, the alarm was triggered. During a return visit, the medical physicists examined the trigger level for the alarm. Background levels, moni tored with no sources of radioactive material present, ranged from 370 to 510 cpm. The threshold for detection set by the landfill owner was less than twice background (600 cpm). A meeting of all concerned parties was convened. The landfill operators had reviewed the company's procedure for landfill monitoring and found that the recommended distance between each detector and the side of the trash container was 4—5ft. The landfill management agreed to increase the distance between the trash container and detector on the driver's side to five feet. The level ofdetection selected by the landfill owner (i.e., 600 cpm) was a more difficult problem to resolve. Most states, including Michigan, do not have regulations for landfill disposal of small quantities of radioactive mate rials. Texas allows disposal of short-lived radionuclides in landfills (1). In Los Angeles, landfill owners allow disposal of up to four times the background level (2). Minnesota, J NucIMed 1993;34:349—350