Abstract:Purpose To investigate the long‐term implant survival rate and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants with different variables associated over an observational period of at least 20 years. Materials and Methods Patients with at least one implant placed prior to 2001 were recalled and visited. Data on implant macro‐design, prosthetic aspects, site distribution, and patient‐related factors were collected. MBL was evaluated on intraoral X‐rays and peri‐implant soft tissue parameters were recorded. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with the treatment received. Descriptive statistics indicators were estimated. Analysis of variance and analysis of covariance models were used to investigate any differences in the MBL and peri‐implant probing depth (PPD) among the variables. A chi‐square analysis was performed to investigate any association between different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and survival/success outcomes. Results Forty‐one (41) patients and 174 implants were included with a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. The implant survival and success rates were 96.5% and 83.3% respectively, while 3.5% of early failures were detected. The lowest success rates were observed for implants supporting fixed full‐arch rehabilitations (71.05%) and overdenture rehabilitations (86.11%). A mean MBL of 1.81 ± 0.71 mm and a mean PPD of 3.38 ± 1.62 mm were recorded. The interaction between the collected data with MBL and PPD did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the variables (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was recorded when analyzing the association between the different types of prosthetic implant‐supported rehabilitations and success rates (p = 0.014), with fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations presenting with lower success rates. Answers to the questionnaire showed a generally high level of satisfaction. Conclusions Within the limits of this retrospective study and based on the results, an implant survival rate higher than 96% was observed after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Both the implant survival rate and MBL seemed stable after a mean observational period of 23.3 ± 2.8 years. Implants supporting fixed and removable full‐arch rehabilitations seemed to present lower success rates over time. Implant rehabilitation seemed to provide patients with optimal long‐term outcomes in terms of functional and psychological aspects.

Assessment of the Survival of a Single Implant-Supported Cantilever Prosthesis in the Anterior Mandible

Outcomes That May Affect Implant and Prosthesis Survival and Complications in Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Retrospective Study of Short Versus Standard Posterior Implants and Analysis of Implant Failure Risk Factors

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant‐supported fixed prostheses with cantilever extension in anterior mandible: A retrospective study

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Clinical Evaluation of the Long-Term Survival and Success Rates of Different Types of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Survival rates, patient satisfaction, and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: a 12-month prospective study

Outcomes and Complications of 33 Soft-Milled Cobalt-Chromium-Ceramic Full-Arch Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with up to 10-Year Follow-Up

Implant Survival and Complication Prevalence in Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years.

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Efficiency of Mandibular Anterior Implant-Supported Fixed Bridges with Cantilevers

Survival Rate, Biomechanical Complications, and Patient Satisfaction of Implant-Supported FRC Full-Arch Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with Follow up of 5 Years

Survival and success rates of soft-milled cobalt-chromium-ceramic full-arch screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: a 2- to 7-year follow-up retrospective study

A Study on Materials Used and Longevity of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Survival and complication rates of tooth‐ and implant‐supported restorations after an observation period up to 36 years

Immediate Loaded Fixed Complete Dentures Supported by Implants in Patients with a History of Periodontitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2 to 7 Years

Immediate Insertion and Restoration of a Single Implant to Replace Two Adjacent Periodontally Compromised Lower Incisors: A Technique Report with up-to-8 Years Follow-up

Clinical Evaluation of a Fixed (retrievable) Implant-Supported Prosthesis in the Edentulous Jaw: a 5-Year Report.

[Immediate Rehabilitation of the Edentulous and Potential Edentulous Jaws with Implant-Supported Full-Arch Prostheses: a Retrospective Analysis of 225 Cases].

Comparative evaluation of hard and soft tissue parameters by using short implants and standard long implants with sinus lift for prosthetic rehabilitation of posterior maxilla

Implant survival rate and marginal bone loss of 174 implants with different variables associated over a minimum observational period of 20 years: A retrospective study

Benchmarking Outcomes in Implant Prosthodontics: Partial Fixed Dental Prostheses and Crowns Supported by Implants with a Turned Surface over 10 to 28 Years at the University of Toronto