ARPEGES: A Bayesian Belief Network to Assess the Risk of Pesticide Contamination for the River Network of France
Jeremy Piffady,Nadia Carluer,Veronique Gouy,Guy Henaff,Thierry Tormos,Nolwenn Bougon,Emilie Adoir,Katell Mellac
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4343
2020-11-03
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Abstract:Pesticides are priority concerns in aquatic risk assessment due to their widespread use, on‐going development of new molecules, and potential effects from short‐ and long‐term exposures to aquatic life. Water quality assessments are also challenged by contrasting pesticide behaviors (e.g., mobility, half‐life time, solubility) in different environmental contexts. Furthermore, monitoring networks are not well adapted to the pesticide media transfer dynamics and therefore fail at providing a reliable assessment of pesticides. We present here a Bayesian belief network that was developed in a cooperative process between researchers specializing in Bayesian modelling, soil sciences, agronomy and diffuse pollutants to provide a tool for stakeholders to assess surface water contamination by pesticides. It integrates knowledge on dominant transfer pathways according to basin physical context and climate for different pesticides properties, such as half‐life duration and affinity to organic carbon, to develop an assessment of risks of contamination for every watershed in France. The resulting model, ARPEGES (Risk Analysis of Water Surface Contamination by Pesticides), was developed in R. A user‐friendly R interface was built to enable stakeholders to not only obtain ARPEGES' results, but also freely use it to test management scenarios. Though it is applicable to any chemical, its results are illustrated for S‐Metolachlor, a pesticide that was widely used on cereals crops worldwide. In addition to providing contamination potential, ARPEGES also provides a way to diagnose its main explaining factors, enabling stakeholders to focus efforts in the most potentially affected basins, but also on the most probable cause of contamination. In this context, the Bayesian belief network allowed us to use information at different scales (i.e., regional contexts for climate, pedology at the basin scale, pesticide use at the municipality scale) to provide an expert assessment of the processes driving pesticide contamination of streams and the associated uncertainties.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
environmental sciences,toxicology