Abstract:Predicting pesticide risk based on landscape patterns could enable landscape‐scale ERA. However, simple metrics of landscape pattern, such as proportion of agricultural land, are not sufficient. We found that risk observed in bee‐collected pollen was best predicted when integrating spatialized pesticide use in the pesticide exposure model, underscoring the importance of such data for research, monitoring and mitigation. Further, we propose a guidance framework for future landscape ecotoxicological risk analyses that clarifies data needs relative to risk prediction goals. Pesticide use in agricultural landscapes creates environmental contamination that is heterogenous in space and time. Mobile organisms, such as bees, are exposed to multiple contamination sources when visiting patches that vary in the amount, timing and toxicity of pesticides used. Yet, environmental risk assessments (ERA) typically fail to consider this heterogeneity, in part because of the complexities of estimating exposure to different pesticides, and subsequent risk at organism‐relevant scales. We use pesticide assays of 269 bee‐collected pollen samples to understand the spatiotemporal variability of risk across a network of 41 field sites in southern Sweden. Observed bee pesticide risk is calculated based on compound‐specific residue quantifications in pollen and standardized toxicity data. We then compare the ability of three classes of landscape‐scale variables to predict this risk: (1) landscape composition and configuration metrics, (2) landscape load based on national pesticide use data and (3) predictions from a newly developed bee pesticide exposure model. Based on use data, 10 crops account for 81% of the total risk. We detected 49 pesticide compounds in bee‐collected pollen. Although herbicides and fungicides constitute the bulk of detected pesticides, both in frequency and amount quantified, unsurprisingly, insecticides contribute the most to risk. Landscape composition and configuration metrics did not predict observed pesticide risk, and interactions with bee species indicate taxa‐dependency in predictions. Landscape load predicted observed risk consistently between taxa. Risk estimates from our exposure model were strongly predictive but only when considering realized risk (i.e., risk estimates based on prior pesticide use information). Synthesis and applications. Predicting pesticide risk based on landscape patterns could enable landscape‐scale ERA. However, simple metrics of landscape pattern, such as proportion of agricultural land, are not sufficient. We found that risk observed in bee‐collected pollen was best predicted when integrating spatialized pesticide use in the pesticide exposure model, underscoring the importance of such data for research, monitoring and mitigation. Further, we propose a guidance framework for future landscape ecotoxicological risk analyses that clarifies data needs relative to risk prediction goals.

Identifying opportunities for high resolution pesticide usage data to improve the efficiency of endangered species pesticide risk assessment

Prioritizing resource allocation to reduce adverse effects of pesticide risk for endangered species

Using emerging science to inform risk characterizations for wildlife within current regulatory frameworks

Overcoming Challenges of Incorporating Higher Tier Data in Ecological Risk Assessments and Risk Management of Pesticides in the United States: Findings and Recommendations from the 2017 Workshop on Regulation and Innovation in Agriculture

Probabilistic co-occurrence assessment for suites of listed species

Developing agricultural pest management strategies with reduced-risks to surface water: An economic case study of California's Central Coast region

National characterization of pesticide runoff and erosion potential to put USEPA standard ecological scenarios in context for pyrethroids

An automated computational data pipeline to rapidly acquire, score, and rank toxicological data for ecological hazard assessment

Integrating emerging science to improve estimates of risk to wildlife from chemical exposure: What are the challenges?

A probabilistic approach to chronic effects assessments for listed species in a vernal pool case study

Wildlife Ecological Risk Assessment in the 21st Century: Promising Technologies to Assess Toxicological Effects

Long‐term, landscape‐level assessment of aquatic pesticide exposure to identify amphibian ontological traits affecting vulnerability

Evaluating the Utility of High-Resolution Spatiotemporal Air Pollution Data in Estimating Local PM2.5 Exposures in California from 2015–2018

Use of point-of-sale data to track usage patterns of residential pesticides: methodology development

Landscapes of risk: A comparative analysis of landscape metrics for the ecotoxicological assessment of pesticide risk to bees

Development and application of an advanced algorithm for environmental risk assessment and safety management of pesticide residues in agricultural soils: Monitoring of currently used pesticide in upland soils

Agroeconomic costs for meeting the Environmental Protection Agency's mitigation menu approach to pesticide regulation

In silico environmental risk assessment improves efficiency for pesticide safety management

Improving species status assessments under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and implications for multispecies conservation challenges worldwide

A conceptual framework for landscape-based environmental risk assessment (ERA) of pesticides

A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case