Abstract:OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Biomechanical risk factors associated with spacesuit manual material handling tasks were evaluated using the singular value decomposition (SVD) technique. SVD analysis decomposed each lifting tasks into primitive motion patterns called eigenposture progression (EP) that contributed to the overall task. Biomechanical metrics, such as total joint displacement, were calculated for each EP. The first EP (a simultaneous knee, hip, and waist movement) had greater biomechanical demands than other EPs. Thus, tasks such as lifting from the floor were identified as "riskier" by having a greater composition of the first EP. The results of this work can be used to improve a task as well as spacesuit design by minimizing riskier movement patterns as shown in this case study. This methodology can be applied in civilian occupational settings to analyze open-ended tasks (e.g., complex product assembly and construction) for ergonomics assessments. Using this method, worker task strategies can be evaluated quantitatively, compared, and redesigned when necessary. Astronauts will perform manual materials handling tasks during future Lunar and Martian exploration missions. Wearing a spacesuit will change lifting kinematics, which could lead to increased musculoskeletal stresses. Thus, it is important to understand how suited motion patterns affect injury risk. The objective of this study was to use the singular value decomposition (SVD) technique to assess movement differences between lifting techniques in a spacesuit with respect to biomechanical risk factors. Joint angles were derived from motion capture data of lifting tasks performed in the MK-III spacesuit. SVD was performed on the joint angles, extracting the common patterns ("eigenposture progressions") across each task and their weightings as a function of time. Biomechanical risk factors such as total joint displacement, moments at the low back waist joint, and stability metrics were calculated for each eigenposture progression (EP). These metrics were related back to each task and compared. The resulting EPs represented characteristic motions that composed each task. For example, the first eigenposture progression (EP1) was identified as waist, hip, and knee motions and the second eigenposture progression (EP2) was described as arm motions. EPs were coupled with different levels of biomechanical stresses, such that EP1 resulted in the greatest amount of joint displacement and low back moment compared to the other EPs. Tasks such as lifting from the floor were identified as "riskier" due to a higher composition of EP1. Differences in EP weightings were also observed across subjects with varying levels of suited experience. The linear factorial analysis, combined with biomechanical stress variables, demonstrated an easy and consistent approach to assess injury risk by relating risk to derived EPs and motions. As shown in the lifting analysis and case study example, suited movement strategies or interventions that minimize "riskier" EPs and reduce injury risk were identified. With further development, a future analysis of relevant suited actions can inform mission and suit design.

Ergonomic Risk Identification for Spacesuit Movements Using Factorial Analysis

Ergonomic Risk Identification for Spacesuit Movements Using Factorial Analysis

A Data Analytic End-to-end Framework for the Automated Quantification of Ergonomic Risk Factors Across Multiple Tasks Using a Single Wearable Sensor

Data-Driven Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Complex Hand-intensive Manufacturing Processes

Automated Workers Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Manual Material Handling using sEMG Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning

Automated Workers’ Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Manual Material Handling Using sEMG Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning

An ergonomic evaluation using a deep learning approach for assessing postural risks in a virtual reality-based smart manufacturing context

A holistic methodology for mitigating awkward postural risks: Evidence from South Indian small-scale industries

Exposures to select risk factors can be estimated from a continuous stream of inertial sensor measurements during a variety of lifting-lowering tasks

Risk Assessment and Biomechanical Analysis of Sewing Machine Operators Using CATIA Software

Managing ergonomic risk assessment among assembly operators in the small‐scale fabrication sector

Criteria for Assessing Exposure to Biomechanical Risk Factors: A Research-to-Practice Guide—Part 1: General Issues and Manual Material Handling

An Online Multi-Index Approach to Human Ergonomics Assessment in the Workplace

Online Ergonomic Evaluation in Realistic Manual Material Handling Task: Proof of Concept

Ergonomic Design of an Adaptive Automation Assembly System

Ergonomic Design of a Workplace Using Virtual Reality and a Motion Capture Suit

Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment output in a repetitive sawmill occupation: Trim-saw operator

Imposing Motion Variability for Ergonomic Human-Robot Collaboration

A pilot study to assess a risk of a high-risk group of low back pain membership in workers who perform the manual material handling tasks

Case studies of ergonomic interventions in automotive parts distribution operations

Digitalization of Musculoskeletal Risk Assessment in a Robotic-Assisted Assembly Workstation