Design of Computer-vision Based System for Multi-person Ergonomics Assessment in Veterinary Practice – A Pilot Study
Jing Yang,S. Kim,Denny Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181322661247
2022-09-01
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Abstract:Compared with other occupations, veterinary medicine and animal care (VMAC) has the 2nd highest incidence rate for nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses [1]. Specifically, survey studies have shown that an increasing number of veterinarians are experiencing musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) [2,3]. These injuries have created a tremendous burden on workers, their families, companies, and the health care system. Many approaches have been employed to measure ergonomic injury risks. Traditionally, the ergonomic risk is assessed through human observation, where the researcher observes and rates subjects ergonomic risk using tools such as Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) [5]. However, the observation-based techniques may be limited by the subjectivity of the grader. Direct measurement that uses wearable devices such as inertial measurement units to collect humans' body position posture has also been proposed [4]. Although it offers a more reliable assessment of ergonomic risk, this approach can be intrusive and thus interfere with the natural motions of worker activities. Conversely, the recent computer vision approach can capture human posture objectively and continuously by taking advantage of deep learning techniques and advanced cameras. However, computer vision approaches have not yet addressed the complexities associated with ergonomic risk among veterinary surgeons. Hence, our pilot study aims to evaluate veterinarians’ ergonomics through a novel computer vision program and compare these findings to traditional grading tools. A total of five (two males, three females) participants from Purdue small animal hospital were recruited. Data was collected in an actual operating room on typical surgical days, where surgeons perform surgery on an animal. During each case, the RealSense 3D camera was placed at each corner of the room. A 15 frames/second sampling rate and RGB resolution of 384 x 480 were used to record the participants’ body postures and movements (Fig.1). Depending on the type of surgery, task duration ranged from 30 min to 120 min. For data analysis, the open-source package was used. The openpose [6] package generated a vector that indicated the location of each identified body point in the given image. The acquisition of 3D posture data from a group of subjects, individually or collectively, was achieved using a dynamic region of interest (ROI) (Fig.2). Each participant’s RULA score was calculated based on the identified body points every 15s. Additionally, body position was graded using the RULA tool by one independent grader, who reviewed the videos and assigned scores every 15s. Given the limited sample size, the association between human and computer scores was performed using nonparametric statistics, Kruskal Wallis test. Statistical significance was considered at a p-value of .05 or less. The computer-graded score did correlation with humangraded score with p-value of 0.04; This study provided evidence regarding the feasibility of body point detection in VMAC practice using computer vision techniques. There are several limitations to the study. As a pilot study, the sample size was small. The next step would be to collect more data to increase the power of statistical analysis. In addition, While the software utilized in the computer program is well validated for detecting postures, continued investigation of dealing with human body occlusion and missing data are desired for ongoing improvements in its accuracy.