Abstract:Introduction The optimal vascular access for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains controversial. Increasing evidence supports intraosseous (IO) access due to faster medication administration and higher first-attempt success rates compared to intravenous (IV) access. However, the impact on patient outcomes has been inconclusive. Methods This retrospective cohort study in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2022, included patients aged ≥18 years with non-traumatic OHCA resuscitated by emergency medical technician paramedics (EMT-Ps) with either IVs or IOs for final vascular access. The exclusion criteria were cardiac arrest en route to the hospital and resuscitation during the coronavirus pandemic (from May 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022). The primary and secondary outcomes were sustained ROSC (≥2 h) and cerebral performance category (CPC) 1–2, respectively. Univariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the primary analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was employed, with variables selected based on a p -value of <0.05 in the univariate analysis. The survival benefits of different insertion sites and subgroups like general ambulance teams (with a composition that includes fewer EMT-Ps and limited experience in using IO access) were also analyzed. Results A total of 2003 patients were enrolled; 1602 received IV access and 401 IO access. The median patient age was 70 years, and most were male (66.6%). Compared to patients receiving IV access, the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for primary and secondary outcomes in patients with IOs were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–1.11; p = 0.20) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.39–2.40; p = 0.93), respectively. Different insertion sites showed no outcome differences. In the subgroups of females and patients resuscitated by general ambulance teams, the aORs for sustained ROSC were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33–0.92; p = 0.02) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41–0.94; p = 0.02), respectively. Conclusions For patients with OHCA resuscitated by EMT-Ps, IO access was comparable to IV access regarding patient outcomes. However, in females and patients resuscitated by general ambulance teams, IV access might be favorable.

Osteoprotegerin and zoledronate bone effects during orthodontic tooth movement.

The association of intravenous vs. humeral-intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

A comparison between intraosseous and intravenous access in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study

Systematic overview of intraosseous access versus intravenous delivery for emergency resuscitation: Efficacy and quality of existing evidence

Questionable measures are pretty meaningless.

Effectiveness of intraosseous access during resuscitation: a retrospective cohort study

A Retrospective Multicenter Study in South Korea

Semi-automated T3 uptake test that uses magnetic albumin microparticles.

Evolution of the use of intraosseous vascular access in prehospital advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The IOVA‐CPR study

Intraosseous vascular access in disasters and mass casualty events: A review of the literature

Intra‐aortic Balloon Pump on In‐hospital Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock: Findings from a Nationwide Registry, China

A multivariate and retrospective analysis of the impact of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in Open-Heart surgery

Factors associated with failure of intraosseous access in prehospital trauma treatment by military medical personnel

A Comparison of Prognostic Factors in a Large Cohort of In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

[Escherichia coli antibodies in urinary tract infections].

In-Hospital vs. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Patient Characteristics and Survival

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: What are their outcomes?

Obesity is Associated with Better Survival and Functional Outcome after Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Aetiology and predictors of outcome in non-shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Concomitant Use of Impella vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump - A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Japanese Claims-Based Database

Comparison of Intraosseous Access and Central Venous Catheterization in Chinese Adult Emergency Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, and Randomized Study.