Abstract:Importance: Survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies widely across emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in the US. However, little is known about which EMS practices are associated with higher agency-level survival. Objective: To identify resuscitation practices associated with favorable neurological survival for OHCA at EMS agencies. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study surveyed EMS agencies participating in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) with 10 or more OHCAs annually during January 2015 to December 2019; data analyses were performed from April to October 2023. Exposure: Survey of resuscitation practices at EMS agencies. Main outcomes and measures: Risk-standardized rates of favorable neurological survival for OHCA at each EMS agency were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. Multivariable linear regression then examined the association of EMS practices with rates of risk-standardized favorable neurological survival. Results: Of 577 eligible EMS agencies, 470 agencies (81.5%) completed the survey. The mean (SD) rate of risk-standardized favorable neurological survival was 8.1% (1.8%). A total of 7 EMS practices across 3 domains (training, cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], and transport) were associated with higher rates of risk-standardized favorable neurological survival. EMS agencies with higher favorable neurological survival rates were more likely to use simulation to assess CPR competency (β = 0.54; P = .05), perform frequent reassessment (at least once every 6 months) of CPR competency in new staff (β = 0.51; P = .04), use full multiperson scenario simulation for ongoing skills training (β = 0.48; P = .01), perform simulation training at least every 6 months (β = 0.63; P < .001), and conduct training in the use of mechanical CPR devices at least once annually (β = 0.43; P = .04). EMS agencies with higher risk-standardized favorable neurological survival were also more likely to use CPR feedback devices (β = 0.58; P = .007) and to transport patients to a designated cardiac arrest or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving center (β = 0.57; P = .003). Adoption of more than half (≥4) of the 7 practices was more common at EMS agencies in the highest quartile of favorable neurological survival rates (70 of 118 agencies [59.3%]) vs the lowest quartile (42 of 118 agencies [35.6%]) (P < .001). Conclusions and relevance: In a national registry for OHCA, 7 practices associated with higher rates of favorable neurological survival were identified at EMS agencies. Given wide variability in neurological survival across EMS agencies, these findings provide initial insights into EMS practices associated with top-performing EMS agencies in OHCA survival. Future studies are needed to validate these findings and identify best practices for EMS agencies.

The association of intravenous vs. humeral-intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

A comparison between intraosseous and intravenous access in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study

Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in upper extremity among adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: cluster randomised clinical trial (VICTOR trial)

Impact of intraosseous versus intravenous resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective study

Systematic overview of intraosseous access versus intravenous delivery for emergency resuscitation: Efficacy and quality of existing evidence

A Retrospective Multicenter Study in South Korea

The Association of Early Naloxone Use with Outcomes in Non-Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract 385: Comparison of Rapid Implementation of Automated Head and Thorax Elevation With Active Compression Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and an Impedance Threshold Device versus National Outcome Data: A Prospective Observational Study

Effectiveness of intraosseous access during resuscitation: a retrospective cohort study

The association of non-prescription drug use preceding out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and clinical outcomes

Outcomes associated with amiodarone and lidocaine for the treatment of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest with shock-refractory pulseless ventricular tachyarrhythmia

Clinical Features and Outcomes Among Patients With Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and an Initial Shockable Rhythm

Initial Defibrillator Pad Position and Outcomes for Shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

The Route to ROSC: Evaluating the Impact of Route and Timing of Epinephrine Administration in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes After Ventricular Fibrillation

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: What are their outcomes?

Evolution of the use of intraosseous vascular access in prehospital advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The IOVA‐CPR study

Intraosseous vascular access in disasters and mass casualty events: A review of the literature

Emergency Medical Service Agency Practices and Cardiac Arrest Survival

Aetiology and predictors of outcome in non-shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Survivability of young sudden cardiac arrest by aetiology: insights from a state-wide adjudicated cardiac arrest registry