Abstract:Responding to climate change and avoiding irreversible climate tipping points requires radical and drastic action by 2030. This urgency raises serious questions for energy companies, one of the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs), in terms of how they frame, and reframe, their response to climate change. Despite the majority of energy companies releasing ambitious statements declaring net zero carbon ambitions, this 'talk' has not been matched with sufficient urgency or substantive climate action. To unpack the disconnect between talk and action, this paper draws on the literature on framing, organisational hypocrisy, and collective moral responsibility. We conduct a longitudinal qualitative content analysis of the framing of climate change used by the ten largest European investor-owned energy companies and the actions they have taken to shift their business practices. Our findings reveal three main categories of energy companies: (i) deflecting, (ii) stagnating, and (iii) evolving. We show key differences in the relationship between framing and action over time for each category, revealing how deflecting companies have larger and persistent gaps between green talk and concrete action and how stagnating companies are delaying action despite increased green talk, while evolving companies exhibit a closer link between talk and action that tends to be realised over time. Our analysis reveals how competing approaches to framing collective moral responsibility help understand the trajectories of talk and action across the different categories of energy companies. This research makes several contributions to the literature on organisational hypocrisy and collective moral responsibility in the context of climate change. Our analysis highlights the complex relationship between collective moral responsibility, organisational hypocrisy and climate action, revealing how different collective framings—diffuse, teleological, or agential—can both enable and offset substantive climate action. The study also enriches our understanding of the performative nature of collective moral responsibility by examining its temporal dimensions and showing how an agential, backward-looking focus is associated with more meaningful climate action.

Misestimations as a barrier to climate action

Widespread misestimates of greenhouse gas emissions suggest low carbon competence

Behavioral barriers impede pro-environmental decision-making: Experimental evidence from incentivized laboratory and vignette studies

Erroneous thinking on climate change

When concern is not enough: Overcoming the climate awareness-action gap

We must re-evaluate assumptions about carbon trading for effective climate change mitigation

The psychological distance of climate change is overestimated

Climate Sentiments in the Financial Sector: How Financial Markets, Policies and Regulations Generate Barriers and Opportunities to Align Portfolios to Sustainability

Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half

Climate action on Twitter: perceived barriers for actions and actors, and sentiments during COP26

Feasible climate mitigation

Exploring the Moral Challenges of Confronting High-Carbon-Emitting Behavior: The Role of Emotions and Media Coverage

Helping the Climate Because Others Do: An Exploratory Analysis of the Psychological Predictors of Intention to Perform High Impact Pro-Environmental Behaviors

Counter-intuitive behaviour of energy system models under CO2 caps and prices

Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility

Assumptions and contradictions shape public engagement on climate change

Framing Collective Moral Responsibility for Climate Change: A Longitudinal Frame Analysis of Energy Company Climate Reporting

Underestimation of personal carbon footprint inequality in four diverse countries

Uncertainty in Climate Science and Climate Policy

What is undermining climate change mitigation? How fossil-fuelled practices challenge low-carbon transitions

Pathways Versus Incentives: Climate Activism to Climate Aligned Portfolio Management