Abstract:Countries pledge GHG mitigation goals in form of near-term emissions targets for 2030, long-term net-zero emissions in mid-century (some countries) and targets for methane emission reductions, towards limiting global warming as stipulated in the Paris Agreement. These undergo regular revisions to strengthen the ambition, with the latest set of revisions occurring during COP26 and COP27. As of December 2022, 169 countries have near-term targets, 56 have long-term targets to become carbon neutral and 150 nations have pledged to reduce their methane emissions up to 30% by 2030. The end-of-century temperature rise is highly sensitive to the pledges but also to actual extent of implementation of these pledges. Using historical emissions from the PRIMAP-Hist dataset, future emissions of CO2, N2O and CH4 are modelled for each country by incorporating their respective near-term, long-term and methane pledges. Emissions for other climate forcers are assumed to follow SSP4-60. These emission profiles are used as input to simple climate model – ACC2 (Tanaka et al., 2021) to estimate the temperature impacts. With the current pledges, the global temperature rise in 2100 is expected to be 2.0 and 2.1 °C, corresponding to the fulfillment of conditional and unconditional near-term pledges, respectively. We further explore a suite of emissions pathways to identify some key ‘levers’ across the pledges that can strongly influence the projected global temperature in 2100. We found that these levers can further reduce the temperature by 0.50 °C or increase by 0.25 °C. The most significant reductions in temperature rise can be achieved by ratcheting up of the current conditional targets by 10%, shifting the net-zero target year to 2050 for all countries currently having a longer-term goal and adding a net-zero target in 2070 for countries with currently no long-term goals. Inclusion of all these levers can increase the likelihood of limiting temperature rise well below 2 °C and bringing it closer to 1.5 °C. Additional, relatively smaller, contributions accrue from inclusion of Russia, China and India in the Global Methane Pledge. On the other hand, failing to meet even the unconditional NDC targets and delaying the current net-zero targets by 10 years contribute to increases in temperature rise of 0.08 and 0.17 °C. Contributions are also evaluated on a country-by-country basis.ReferenceTanaka K, Boucher O, Ciais P, Johansson DJA, Morfeldt J (2021) Cost-effective implementation of the Paris Agreement using flexible greenhouse gas metrics. Science Advances 7 (22):eabf9020. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf902

Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility

Large Uncertainty in Carbon Uptake Potential of Land-Based Climate-Change Mitigation Efforts

Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases

Uncertainty of temperature rise under nationally determined contributions and carbon neutral policies

Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment

Uncertainty in Projected Climate Change Arising from Uncertain Fossil-Fuel Emission Factors

Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon

How uncertainty in technology costs and carbon dioxide removal availability affect climate mitigation pathways

The Contribution of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation to Achieving Long-Term Temperature Goals

Levers of climate pledges influencing the Paris Agreement target

Least-cost and 2 °C-Compliant Mitigation Pathways Robust to Physical Uncertainty, Economic Paradigms, and Intergenerational Cost Distribution

Decomposing high uncertainty in greenhouse gas mitigation pathways in emerging regions: An approach to evaluate risks toward carbon neutrality

A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation

The Kyoto Protocol and non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sinks

The Relevance of Uncertainty in Future Crop Production for Mitigation Strategy Planning

Non-Co2 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Modeling with Marginal Abatement Cost Curves: Technical Change, Emission Scenarios and Policy Costs

Extending Near‐Term Emissions Scenarios to Assess Warming Implications of Paris Agreement NDCs

Trade-offs between mitigation costs and temperature change

Addressing uncertainty and bias in land use, land use change, and forestry greenhouse gas inventories

Approximate calculations of the net economic impact of global warming mitigation targets under heightened damage estimates

Substantial reductions in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions reductions implied by IPCC estimates of the remaining carbon budget