Abstract:Climate change is one of the most urgent issues that the whole world is facing.The "knowledge deficit theory",which has been used as the basis for government policy-making for many decades,is criticized for being too simple.Recently,some scholars put forward a new idea that there might be a link between one's metacognition of climate change and his/her pro-environmental attitude and behaviour(Scannell & Grouzet,2010).Based on their and Petty's classification of metacognition,this article reviews recent studies and theories in four dimensions:the confidence in one's knowledge level about climate change risk(metacognition knowledge),the judgment one makes about where his/her ideas of climate change risk come from(metacognition origin),the judgment of the likelihood of a given climate change outcome(metacognition certainty) and the weight or importance one places on the cognition of climate change (metacognition importance) and finds;(1) There is often a mismatch between the public's actual knowledge and their metacognition knowledge.A lot of people,who are more or less overconfident in their knowledge level about climate change,may engage in actions which they believe are helpful but objectively are not,and hesitate to make further information-seeking effort.(2) Since climate change is a statistic trend,it is too hard to be detected by one's personal experience,most people learn about this kind of risk from climate scientists and their social amplifier's description,so the public's risk perception is mainly oriented by the analytic system rather than the experience system.The analytic system,which requires justification via logic and evidence,cannot create a sense of urgency and are unlikely to motivate immediate actions;and virtual reality technology used in some disaster movies does activate the experience system, but their effects still remain to be elucidated.(3) While reading climate change reports,people usually pay more attention to the gist of the information instead of details,so they would be insensitive to the increased degree of certainty.At the same time,mass media's discontinuance reports and "balanced" reporting journalistic norm also reduce the public's certainty of climate change risk.(4) People generally consider climate change an event that will happen in the future and on the other side of the world,so they construe it in more terms and have most cognitive resources allocated to the present event.According to the theory of discounting,people usually have a strong present bias,they strongly prefer immediate benefits and dislike present costs relative to delayed options,so the future benefit of pro-environmental behavior is discounted.In this way,the metacognition importance of climate change is diminished when compared with other current events.All these metacognitive elements become psychological barriers standing in the way of behavior change that would help to limit CO_2 emission,no wonder over years the overall condition of climate change has not changed much.Finally, the future trends of research on metacognition of climate change risk are discussed.How to make full use of the fruitful achievements in the metacognition field to promote the public's pro-environmental behaviour is of great importance.

The psychological distance of climate change is overestimated

A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct

Climate Change From a Distance: An Analysis of Construal Level and Psychological Distance From Climate Change

From concern to action: the role of psychological distance in attitude towards environmental issues

"Going the distance"? The effects of a new method of proximizing climate change on perceived distance, risk perception, emotional response, and engagement in climate change mitigation

The Psychological Distance and Climate Change: A Systematic Review on the Mitigation and Adaptation Behaviors

The influence of risk perception on climate change communication behavior: a dual perspective of psychological distance and environmental values

Abstract or concrete? The effect of climate change images on people’s estimation of egocentric psychological distance

Distance makes the mind grow broader: an overview of psychological distance studies in the environmental and health domains

Do Individual Differences in Perception Affect Awareness of Climate Change?

Overestimating One's “Green” Behavior: Better‐Than‐Average Bias May Function to Reduce Perceived Personal Threat from Climate Change

Wrinkles in Time and Drops in the Bucket: Circumventing Temporal and Social Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior

A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Climate Change Experience and Climate Change Perception

Seeing climate change: psychological distance and connection to nature

Assessing Psychologists' Preparedness, Exposure to Climate-Health Impacts, Willingness to Act on Climate Change, and Barriers to Effective Action

Promoting climate actions: A cognitive-constraints approach

Do Attitudes Toward Air Pollution Influence Climate Change Perception? Evidence from Online Customers in China

A Research on Climate Change Risk from a Metacognitive Perspective

How and when higher climate change risk perception promotes less climate change inaction

When concern is not enough: Overcoming the climate awareness-action gap

The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy: A social psychological perspective