Safety of Early Discharge Among Low-Risk Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Firman Sugiharto,Yanny Trisyani,Aan Nuraeni,Praneed Songwathana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s451598
2024-03-06
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Firman Sugiharto, 1 Yanny Trisyani, 2 Aan Nuraeni, 2 Praneed Songwathana 3 1 Master Study Program, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia; 2 Department of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia; 3 Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, 90110, Thailand Correspondence: Firman Sugiharto, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Raya Ir. Soekarno KM. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor, Sumedang, West Java, 45363, Indonesia, Tel +6282218235600, Fax +6282287793411, Email Background: Guidelines for early discharge (ED) strategies after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in low-risk patients still need to be informed. Previous meta-analysis evidence is considered to have limitations, from the level of heterogeneity, which is still relatively high, and the sample size still needed to be more significant. Purpose: This study aims to identify the safety of early discharge after PPCI in low-risk patients Methods: The literature search used five primary databases: CINAHL, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor and Francis, and one search engine: Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently screened and critically appraised studies using JBI's and Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Fixed and random effects model were applied to collect standardized mean differences and risk differences. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 and JAMOVI version 2.4.8.0. Results: Seven RCTs consisting of 1.780 patients and seven cohort studies consisting of 46.710 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. The results of the RCT analysis showed no significant differences in all-cause readmission (RD − 0.01; 95% CI: − 0.04 to 0.01; Z=1.20; p =0.23; I 2 =0%) and mortality (RD 0.00; 95% CI: − 0.01 to 0.01; Z=0.01; p =0.99; I 2 =0%) and also significant in reducing LOS in hour (SMD − 2.32; 95% CI: − 3.13 to − 1.51; Z=5.64; p < 0.001; I 2 =93%) and day (SMD − 0.58; 95% CI: - 1.00 to − 0.17; Z=2.76; p =0.006; I 2 =84%). In addition, analysis of cohort studies showed that ED strategy was associated with all-cause readmission (RD − 0.00; 95% CI: − 0.01 to − 0.00; Z =2.18; p =0.03; I 2 =0%) and mortality (RD − 0.01; 95% CI: − 0.02 to − 0.00; Z=2.04; p =0.04; I 2 =94%). Conclusion: ED strategies in low-risk patients after PPCI can be completely safe. This is proven by the absence of significant differences in readmission and mortality rates as well as reduce the length of stay. Keywords: coronary heart disease, early discharge, meta-analysis, PPCI Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is one of the causes of very high mortality and morbidity worldwide. 1 Globally, in 2020 as many as 19.05 million people died due to heart disease, including myocardial infarction. 1 The latest data shows that in the United States as many as 1.522.669 deaths caused by AMI were recorded during the last 10 years from 2012 to 2022. 1 AMI occurs due to partial or total occlusion of the coronary arteries, which requires rapid and accurate intervention. 2 The American Heart Association (AHA) determines that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the leading and influential treatment reference for managing patients with myocardial infarction. 3 Recently, much attention has been paid to identifying low-risk patient groups in post-PPCI patients who enable early discharge (ED) strategies to be feasible and safe. 4 However, the definition and criteria for low-risk patients in post-PPCI patients still need to be clarified. 4 Criteria for patients who can be discharged earlier after AMI can be identified using simple criteria such as Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II), Zwolle primary PCI Index, or other criteria. 5 PAMI-II criteria define low-risk patients aged 45%, one or two vascular diseases, successful PCI, and no persistent arrhythmias. 5,6 The American College of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines do not provide any recommendations regarding optimal discharge time. In contrast, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend an ED strategy within 48–72 hours for low-risk (Class IIa) AMI patients. 3,5 However, available data regarding the application of ED in clinical practice still needs to be improved. 7 Additionally, studies assessing the safety and feasibility of shorter LOS after PPCI are limited. 4,8 In fac -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services