Abstract:Background: Valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation (VR + CABG) is usually associated with higher mortality and complication rates. Currently, angiography remains the most commonly used approach to guide CABG. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-guided strategy can improve the clinical outcomes of VR + CABG. Methods: Patients ( n = 536) treated by VR + CABG between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively assessed. In 116 patients, all lesions were revascularized entirely based on QFR (the QFR-guided group), whereas in 420 patients, all lesions were revascularized entirely based on angiography (the angiography-guided group). To minimize selection bias between the 2 groups, propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:2. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 1-year, which was defined as a composite of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), any repeat revascularization, and stroke. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the baseline clinical characteristics between the QFR-guided and angiography-guided groups after propensity score matching. The mean age of all patients was 66.2 years [standard deviation (SD) = 8.3], 370 (69%) were men, the mean body-mass index of the population was 24.8 kg/m 2 (SD = 4.5), 129 (24%) had diabetes, and 229 (43%) had angina symptoms. When compared with the angiography-guided group, the QFR-guided group had a significantly shorter operative time (323 ± 60 min vs. 343 ± 71 min, P = 0.010), extra corporal circulation time (137 ± 38 min vs. 155 ± 62 min, P = 0.004), clamp time (73 ± 19 min vs. 81 ± 18 min, P < 0.001), and less intraoperative bleeding volume (640 ± 148 ml vs. 682 ± 166 ml, P = 0.022). Compared with the angiography-guided group, the 1-year MACCE was significantly lower in the QFR-guided group (6.9% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.036, hazard ratio = 0.455, 95% confidence interval: 0.211–0.982). Conclusion: Our results raise the hypothesis that among patients who undergo VR + CABG, QFR-guided strategy is associated with optimized surgical procedure and a superior clinical outcome, as evidenced by a lower rate of MACCE at 1-year compared with conventional angiography-guided strategy.

The efficacy and safety of quantitative flow ratio-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Neointimal Characteristics in Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for In-Stent Restenosis

Role of ST‐Segment Resolution Alone and in Combination with TIMI Flow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated with Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Immediate Angiography Derived Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio after Bioresorbable Scaffold and Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes.

2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions.

Complete Revascularization Based on Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Incomplete Revascularization in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Clinical Implication of QFR in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided Residual Functional SYNTAX Score for Risk Assessment in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Quantitative Flow Ratio As a Continuous Predictor of Myocardial Infarction

Association between the insufficient improvement of the quantitative flow ratio and worsening outcomes in ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction: a multicentre prospective cohort study

Novel Application of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Microvascular Dysfunction after ST-segment-elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Precise Assessments of Dissection Following Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes in De Novo Small Vessel Disease

Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Strategy Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Rationale and Design of the FAVOR III China Trial.

Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound for PCI.

Outcomes of Functionally Complete vs Incomplete Revascularization Insights From the FAVOR III China Trial

Quantitative flow ratio-guided versus angiography-guided operation for valve disease accompanying coronary heart disease

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Revascularization Strategies Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Primary Noncoronary Cardiac Surgery