Abstract:Importance: Treatment strategies for intermediate coronary lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes. Identifying low-risk deferred vessels to ensure the safe deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and high-risk revascularized vessels that necessitate thorough follow-up can help determine optimal treatment strategies.Objectives: To investigate outcomes according to treatment types and FFR and IVUS parameters after FFR- or IVUS-guided treatment.Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients with intermediate coronary stenosis from the Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial, an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial that assigned patients into an IVUS-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for minimum lumen area [MLA] <= 3 mm2 or 3 mm2 to 4 mm2 with plaque burden [PB] >= 70%) or an FFR-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for FFR <= 0.80). Data were analyzed from November to December 2022.Exposures: FFR or IVUS parameters within the deferred and revascularized vessels.Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 2 years.Results: A total of 1619 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.6] years; 1137 [70.2%] male) with 1753 vessels were included in analysis. In 950 vessels for which revascularization was deferred, incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = .72). Vessels with FFR greater than 0.92 in the FFR group and MLA greater than 4.5 mm2 or PB of 58% or less in the IVUS group were identified as low-risk deferred vessels, with a decreased risk of TVF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.71]; P = .009). In 803 revascularized vessels, the incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.6% vs 3.7%; P = .95), which was similar in the revascularized vessels undergoing PCI optimization (4.2% vs 2.5%; P = .31). Vessels with post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less in the FFR group or minimum stent area of 6.0 mm2 or less or with PB at stent edge greater than 58% in the IVUS group had an increased risk for TVF (HR, 7.20 [95% CI, 3.20-16.21]; P < .001).Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies showed comparable outcomes in both deferred and revascularized vessels. Binary FFR and IVUS parameters could further define low-risk deferred vessels and high-risk revascularized vessels.

Short-Term Risk Stratification of Non-Flow-Limiting Coronary Stenosis by Angiographically Derived Radial Wall Strain

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Immediate Angiography Derived Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio after Bioresorbable Scaffold and Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Role of ST‐Segment Resolution Alone and in Combination with TIMI Flow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Neointimal Characteristics in Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for In-Stent Restenosis

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Relationship of Coronary Angiography-Derived Radial Wall Strain With Functional Significance, Plaque Morphology, and Clinical Outcomes

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions with Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis but Low Fractional Flow Reserve.

Angiography-derived Radial Wall Strain Predicts Coronary Lesion Progression in Non-Culprit Intermediate Stenosis

Impact of Radial Wall Strain on Serial Changes in Vascular Physiology in Patients with Intermediate Coronary Stenosis

The Association Between Angiographically Derived Radial Wall Strain and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions by IVUS Versus FFR-Guided Treatment Decision.

On-Site Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Management of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The TARGET Randomized Trial

Two birds with one stone: integrated assessment of coronary physiology and plaque vulnerability from a single angiographic view-a case report

A Simple Angio-based Coronary Flow Assessment of Culprit Vessels in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated with Long-Term Prognosis after ST-segment-elevation Myocardial Infarction

The efficacy and safety of quantitative flow ratio-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial

The Association Between Quantitative Flow Ratio and Intravascular Imaging-defined Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Patients with Stable Angina and Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Value of the Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Long-term Target Vessel Failure in Patients with In-stent Restenosis after Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty

Predictors of vessel quantitative flow ratio loss in patients with severely calcified lesions after rotational atherectomy

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Plaque Characteristics in Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Treatment Strategy