Finite Element Analysis of Fixed-Bearing Knee Prosthesis with Different Size of Femur and Tibia Parts
LIU Zhi-hong,LIU Li,WEI Lin,FENG Jian-min,DENG Lian-fu,SHEN Yu-hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2012.05.014
2012-01-01
International Journal of Orthopaedics
Abstract:Objective In order to fit the anatomical bone form,different size of femoral and tibial part of fixed-bearing modular knee prosthesis are often used.This study investigates contact stress of different matching groups by finite element analysis(FEA),with the aim of learning the potential risks of different matching groups of knee prosthesis.Methods The size 3 cochrome femoral prosthesis,size 2.5,3 and 4 titanium tibial tray and 10 mm polyethylene insert of Depuy PFC Sigma fixed-bearing knee prosthesis was selected for study.Experimental group: size 3 femoral prosthesis with size 2.5(3/2.5) and 4(3/4) tibial prosthesis.Control group: size 3 femoral prosthesis with size 3 tibial prosthesis(3/3).Finite element models were constructed respectively in two groups.Max.equivalent stress of simulative standing,flat-floor walking,walking upstairs with knee flexion of 0°,10°,20°,30°,45°,60°and 75°were studied.The difference of equivalent stress between experimental group and control group was compared.Results The Max.equivalent stress of experimental group(3/2.5 or 3/4) was higher than that of control group(3/3).In the simulative standing mode,there was no significant difference between 3/3 and 3/2.5 pairing(P0.05) and there was significant difference between 3/3 and 3/4 pairing(P0.05).In the simulative flat-floor walking mode,there was significant difference between 3/3,3/2.5 and 3/4 pairing among different angles from 0°to 75°(P0.05).In the simulative walking upstairs mode,there was significant difference between 3/3,3/2.5 and 3/4 pairing among different angles from 0°to 30°(P0.05),yet no significant difference was found within the range of 45°to 75°(P0.05).Conclusions The Max.equivalent stress of contact area at different motion angle and status of experimental group(3/2.5 or 3/4) increases due to different sizes of femoral and tibial prosthesis,which may lead to increased wearing of polyethylene insert.