Understanding the impact of non-synchronous wind and solar generation on grid stability and identifying mitigation pathways

Samuel C. Johnson,Joshua D. Rhodes,Michael E. Webber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114492

IF: 11.2

2020-03-01

Applied Energy

Abstract:<p>High penetrations of non-synchronous renewable energy generation can decrease overall grid stability because these units do not provide rotational inertia in the same way as traditional synchronously-connected generators. Many recent studies have investigated 100% renewable energy generation scenarios, but few have explored the trade-offs associated with an electricity grid dominated by non-synchronous generation (i.e. wind and solar). Fast frequency response from grid-forming inverters—along with other technology changes—could help mitigate low system inertia levels, but the impact of this response is unknown. An inertia-constrained unit commitment and dispatch model was used to study the stability of future grid scenarios with high penetrations of non-synchronous renewable energy generation under a variety of technology scenarios. The Texas grid (the Electric Reliability Council of Texas – ERCOT) was used as a test case and instances when the system inertia fell below 100 GW<span class="math"><math>·</math></span>s (the grid's current minimum level) were recorded. When the modeled critical inertia limit was reduced to 80 GW<span class="math"><math>·</math></span>s to represent changes in grid operation, no critical inertia hours occurred for renewable energy penetrations up to 93% of annual energy. The critical inertia limit could drop to 60 GW<span class="math"><math>·</math></span>s if the largest generators in ERCOT (two co-located nuclear plants) were retired, but emissions increased by <span class="math"><math>~</math></span>25% in these scenarios. If the critical inertia limit was kept the same (100 GW<span class="math"><math>·</math></span>s), adding 525 MW of fast frequency response from wind, solar, and energy storage could reduce the number of critical inertia hours by up to 95%. These results show that changes to grid operating practices and generator retirements reduced critical inertia hours more than fast frequency response from inverter-connected resources. Each of these mitigation pathways has associated trade-offs, so the transition to a grid dominated by non-synchronous energy generation should be handled with care, but high renewable energy penetrations (i.e. <em>&gt;</em>80%) might be feasible in Texas.</p>

energy & fuels,engineering, chemical