Abstract:Humans seldom consider themselves as animals, and that humans are animals is a truth frequently turned into an insulting metaphor indicating "uncivilized" behavior in many cultures. Interestingly, the "civilizing" aspects of Western Culture in the Global North are historically derived from traditions of democracy based on living in cities from which the wild has been banished. This is embedded in the English language since civilizing and civilization come from the Latin for city, civitas, the place where citizens hold voting rights. Beyond the gates of civilization is the wild. How the wild and nature have been constructed and demarcated is an enormously complex and enduring challenge in western philosophy as it relates to knowledge-making, existence, truth, and reality. Indeed, whilst people generally believe they know what nature means, they rarely realize that little in nature is wild. Furthermore, the concept of uncertainty, central to the pandemic, is compounded by climate instability and a potentially disastrous future. This is breaking down what is known, requiring porous and flexible conceptual frontiers and a transdisciplinary approach. This article traces the linguistic separation of humans from their animal origins and wilder environments for political and increasingly greedy economic purposes. It explores the acknowledged complexity of healthy human-nature interactions, juxtaposing information mainly from the humanities and social sciences. Demonstrating how unhealthy the current paradigm has proven to be for humans and the natural world, it brings together conflicting information to disrupt traditional certainties using an innovative bricolage methodology. It weaves and combines different ways of knowing as it considers forms of knowledge-making, rewilding, foraging, the place of magical thinking, and vital force. It concludes that a new paradigm is needed to enable a way of working toward any vision of healthy human-nature interaction.

How the diversity of human concepts of nature affects conservation of biodiversity

Towards a Better Understanding of Diversity

Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation

Contributions of human cultures to biodiversity and ecosystem conservation

People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years

What is biodiversity conservation?

Language matters for biodiversity

Multiple Conceptualizations of Nature Are Key to Inclusivity and Legitimacy in Global Environmental Governance

The moral landscape of biological conservation: Understanding conceptual and normative foundations

Nature's value and biodiversity ethics in a changing world: Insights from a special issue and questions for the future

Why conserve biodiversity? A multi-national exploration of stakeholders’ views on the arguments for biodiversity conservation

Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience

Into the wild: uncertain frontiers and sustainable human-nature interactions

Conceptualizing Human-Nature Relationships: Implications of Human Exceptionalist Thinking for Sustainability and Conservation

Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas

Introduction: Human-nature interactions through a multispecies lens

Ontology of Natural Landscapes and Human Global Environmental Consciousness

Too much diversity—Multiple definitions of geodiversity hinder its potential in biodiversity research

The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation

Wilderness, Nature and Society: contributions to the history of an environmental attitude

Biodiversity and cultural diversity are morally valued