Language matters for biodiversity

Robert D Fish,Gail E Austen,Jacob W Bentley,Martin Dallimer,Jessica C Fisher,Katherine N Irvine,Phoebe R Bentley,Maximilian Nawrath,Zoe G Davies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae014

IF: 10.1

2024-03-19

BioScience

Abstract:Abstract Language is central to the way people learn about the natural world. A salient concern of the biodiversity conservation arena has been to understand how language can be employed by scientists to communicate knowledge to nonexpert audiences and build ecological literacy. The use of analogy and narrative by scientists are prominent techniques. In this article, we consider how these two modes of language-based reasoning extend into ordinary conversational language use by the public, specifically when articulating everyday understanding and experiences of biodiversity. Drawing on a process of public engagement in a UK woodland environment, a typological framework based on principles of analogical and narrative reasoning is developed to characterize the precise character of processes of everyday biodiversity sense making. The implications of the framework are discussed in the context of future biodiversity research, particularly its participatory and educational dimensions.

biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem this paper attempts to address is: how to understand biodiversity through language, and explore how language is used in public everyday conversations to construct understanding and experience of biodiversity. Specifically, the author focuses on how analogy and narrative, as two forms of linguistic reasoning, extend in everyday conversations of ordinary people, particularly in describing and understanding biodiversity.

### Background and Research Objectives
1. **The Importance of Language in Biodiversity Conservation**:
- Language is a core tool for people to learn about the natural world and is especially important for biodiversity conservation.
- Scientists often use analogy and narrative to convey knowledge to non-expert audiences to enhance ecological literacy.

2. **Research Objectives**:
- Develop a framework based on analogy and narrative reasoning to characterize the specific processes of everyday biodiversity understanding by analyzing public engagement in the UK forest environment.
- Explore the impact of this framework on future biodiversity research, particularly in participatory and educational dimensions.

### Research Methods
- **Participatory Research**: The author conducted four public workshops, each lasting 2.5 days, with participants from different regions of England, Scotland, and Wales, covering various ages, genders, ethnicities, and social classes.
- **Data Collection**: Data were collected through group discussions and the Q-methodology with images. Participants recorded their observations and feelings after visiting the forest and shared these experiences in group discussions.

### Main Findings
1. **Analogical Reasoning**:
- Participants used various comparative means (such as metaphors, similes, and analogies) to speculate, explore, and learn about the attributes of biodiversity.
- Identified 12 analogy domains, each representing a source of everyday social and cultural significance used to infer the natural world.
- Analogical reasoning involves four key understanding processes: assessing ecological quality, understanding ecosystem processes, expressing wonder and pleasure in nature, and referencing the ecological basis of social systems.

2. **Narrative Reasoning**:
- Narratives provide a basis for memory and learning through sequences of events; stories are repositories of personal and cultural information that influence how people think about biodiversity.
- Identified four types of narratives: personalized narratives, collective memory narratives, cultural and historical narratives, and future imagination narratives.

### Conclusion
- Through analogical and narrative reasoning, ordinary people can attribute meaning, value, and importance to natural phenomena.
- These forms of linguistic reasoning not only help the public better understand biodiversity but also provide valuable references for future biodiversity education and conservation efforts.

In summary, this paper reveals the important role of analogy and narrative in understanding biodiversity by deeply analyzing the linguistic reasoning used in everyday public conversations, offering new perspectives for enhancing ecological literacy and promoting biodiversity conservation.