Abstract:Accelerating urbanisation and associated lifestyle changes result in loss of biodiversity and diminished wellbeing of people through fewer direct interactions and experiences with nature. In this review, we propose the notion of urban wilding (the promotion of autonomous ecological processes that are independent of historical land‐use conditions, with minimal direct human maintenance and planting interventions) and investigate its propensity to improve biodiversity and people–nature connections in cities. Through a large interdisciplinary synthesis, we explore the ecological mechanisms through which urban wilding can promote biodiversity in cities, investigate the attitudes and relations of city dwellers towards urban wild spaces, and discuss the integration of urban wilding into the fabric of cities and its governance. We show that favouring assembly spontaneity by reducing planting interventions, and functional spontaneity by limiting maintenance practices, can promote plant diversity and provide ecological resources for numerous organisms at habitat and city scales. These processes could reverse biotic homogenisation, but further studies are needed to understand the effects of wilding on invasive species and their consequences. From a socio‐ecological perspective, the attitudes of city dwellers towards spontaneous vegetation are modulated by successional stages, with grassland and woodland stages preferred, but dense shrubby vegetation stages disliked. Wild spaces can diversify physical interactions with nature, and enrich multi‐sensory, affective and cognitive experiences of nature in cities. However, some aspects of wild spaces can cause anxiety, feeling unsafe, and the perception of abandonment. These negative attitudes could be mitigated by subtle design and maintenance interventions. While nature has long been thought of as ornamental and instrumental in cities, urban wilding could help to develop relational and intrinsic values of nature in the fabric of cities. Wildness and its singular aesthetics should be combined with cultural norms, resident uses and urban functions to plan and design urban spatial configurations promoting human–non‐human cohabitation. For urban wilding to be socially just and adapted to the needs of residents, its implementation should be backed by inclusive governance opening up discussion forums to residents and urban workers. Scientists can support these changes by collaborating with urban actors to design and experiment with new wild spaces promoting biodiversity and wellbeing of people in cities.

Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience

Designing nature in cities to safeguard meaningful experiences of biodiversity in an urbanizing world

Conserving urban biodiversity: Current practice, barriers, and enablers

Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation via Urban Ecosystem Regeneration

Connecting people with place-specific nature in cities reduces unintentional harm

Urban wildlife ecology and conservation:A brief history of the discipline

What is biodiversity conservation?

Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design

Contrasting effects of visiting urban green-space and the countryside on biodiversity knowledge and conservation support

Urban Gardens as a Space to Engender Biophilia: Evidence and Ways Forward

Towards a Better Understanding of Diversity

Wilding cities for biodiversity and people: a transdisciplinary framework

The Biological Deserts Fallacy: Cities in Their Landscapes Contribute More than We Think to Regional Biodiversity

Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Urban Development

Promoting urban ecological resilience through the lens of avian biodiversity

Urban Biodiversity in the Anthropocene

Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science

A Research Agenda for Urban Biodiversity in the Global Extinction Crisis

Characterizing personalized ecologies

Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people