Abstract:Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity conservation requires profound structural changes worldwide. Often, discussions are centered on management at the field level. However, a wide and growing body of evidence calls for zooming out and targeting agricultural policies, research, and interventions at the landscape level to halt and reverse the decline in biodiversity, increase biodiversity-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes, and improve the resilience and adaptability of these ecosystems. We conducted the most comprehensive assessment to date on landscape complexity effects on nondomesticated terrestrial biodiversity through a meta-analysis of 1,134 effect sizes from 157 peer-reviewed articles. Increasing landscape complexity through changes in composition, configuration, or heterogeneity significatively and positively affects biodiversity. More complex landscapes host more biodiversity (richness, abundance, and evenness) with potential benefits to sustainable agricultural production and conservation, and effects are likely underestimated. The few articles that assessed the combined contribution of linear (e.g., hedgerows) and areal (e.g., woodlots) elements resulted in a near-doubling of the effect sizes (i.e., biodiversity level) compared to the dominant number of studies measuring these elements separately. Similarly, positive effects on biodiversity are stronger in articles monitoring biodiversity for at least 2 y compared to the dominant 1-y monitoring efforts. Besides, positive and stronger effects exist when monitoring occurs in nonoverlapping landscapes, highlighting the need for long-term and robustly designed monitoring efforts. Living in harmony with nature will require shifting paradigms toward valuing and promoting multifunctional agriculture at the farm and landscape levels with a research agenda that untangles complex agricultural landscapes' contributions to people and nature under current and future conditions.

Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people

CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES

Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns

Cost-effective biodiversity protection through multiuse-conservation landscapes

Mapping the planet’s critical areas for biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people

Working landscapes need at least 20% native habitat

People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years

Supporting conservation with biodiversity research in sub-Saharan Africa’s human-modified landscapes

Conserving urban biodiversity: Current practice, barriers, and enablers

Relocating Built-Up Land for Biodiversity Conservation in an Uncertain Future.

Small but irreplaceable: The conservation value of landscape remnants for urban plant diversity

Challenges and Opportunities for Soil Biodiversity in the Anthropocene

Impacts of urban land-cover on plant community structure and biodiversity in a multi-use landscape

A landscape ecology assessment of land-use change on the Great Plains-Denver (CO, USA) metropolitan edge

Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization

Framing the relationship between people and nature in the context of European conservation

People and nature – fostering inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration for biodiversity and sustainable human interactions

Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis

Managing Rather Than Avoiding “difficulties” in Building Landscape Resilience

Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation via Urban Ecosystem Regeneration

Transdisciplinary approaches assessing unmanaged urban green spaces reveal benefits for biodiversity and people