Microdrepanocytic anemia in a Jewish Negro woman.

M. Floch,H. Greenwald,L. Sussman,J. Litwins

1959-01-15

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM) Demonstrates High Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability in Assessing Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing

Anthony V. Christiano,Abraham M. Goch,Christopher J. Burke,Philipp Leucht,Sanjit R. Konda,Kenneth A. Egol

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09680-4

2019-04-22

HSS Journal ®

Abstract:<h3>Background</h3><p>Orthopedic surgeons use radiographs to determine degrees of fracture healing, guide progression of clinical care, and assist in determining weight bearing and removal of immobilization. However, no gold standard exists to determine the progression of healing of humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively.</p>
Scoring of radiographic cortical healing with the radiographic humerus union measurement predicts union in humeral shaft fractures

Anthony V. Christiano,Christian A. Pean,Philipp Leucht,Sanjit R. Konda,Kenneth A. Egol

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02635-0

2020-02-07

Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this study is to determine if the radiographic humerus union measurement (RHUM) is predictive of union in humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively.MethodsAll patients with long bone fracture nonunion presenting to a single surgeon were enrolled in a prospective registry. This registry was queried to identify patients with humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively and developed nonunion. The nonunion cohort was matched to a three to one gender- and age-matched control group that were treated nonoperatively for a humeral shaft fracture and achieved union. Two fellowship-trained orthopedic traumatologists blinded to eventual union scored radiographs obtained 12 weeks after injury using the RHUM. A binomial logistic regression determined the effect of the RHUM on the likelihood of developing union.ResultsNine patients with humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively with radiographs 12 weeks after injury that developed nonunion were identified. These patients were matched to 27 controls. Logistic regression demonstrated the RHUM was a significant predictor of healing 12 weeks after humeral shaft fracture treated nonoperatively (p = 0.014, odds ratio 9.434, 95% CI for OR 1.586–56.098). All patients with RHUM below 7 went on to nonunion. All patients with RHUM above 8 healed. Three of seven patients (43%) with RHUM of 7 or 8 healed.ConclusionThe RHUM demonstrated an increased likelihood of achieving union 12 weeks after injury. Orthopedic surgeons can counsel patients that fractures with RHUM scores of 6 or below are in danger of developing nonunion and can target interventions appropriately.
The Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) predicts humeral shaft nonunion.

J. Nicholson,W. Oliver,N. Clement,S. Molyneux,T. White,A. Duckworth,Thomas J Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2019-0304.R1

2019-09-30

The Bone & Joint Journal

Abstract:AIMS The primary aim of this study was to develop a reliable, effective radiological score to assess the healing of humeral shaft fractures, the Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU). The secondary aim was to assess whether the six-week RUSHU was predictive of nonunion at six months after the injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS Initially, 20 patients with radiographs six weeks following a humeral shaft fracture were selected at random from a trauma database and scored by three observers, based on the Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures system. After refinement of the RUSHU criteria, a second group of 60 patients with radiographs six weeks after injury, 40 with fractures that united and 20 with fractures that developed nonunion, were scored by two blinded observers. RESULTS After refinement, the interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.87), indicating substantial agreement. At six weeks after injury, patients whose fractures united had a significantly higher median score than those who developed nonunion (10 vs 7; p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve determined that a RUSHU cut-off of < 8 was predictive of nonunion (area under the curve = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.94). The sensitivity was 75% and specificity 80% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 65% and a negative predictive value of 86%. Patients with a RUSHU < 8 (n = 23) were more likely to develop nonunion than those with a RUSHU ≥ 8 (n = 37, odds ratio 12.0, 95% CI 3.4 to 42.9). Based on a PPV of 65%, if all patients with a RUSHU < 8 underwent fixation, the number of procedures needed to avoid one nonunion would be 1.5. CONCLUSION The RUSHU is reliable and effective in identifying patients at risk of nonunion of a humeral shaft fracture at six weeks after injury. This tool requires external validation but could potentially reduce the morbidity associated with delayed treatment of an established nonunion. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1300-1306.

Medicine
The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons

Mary M. Chiavaras,Simrit Bains,Hema Choudur,Naveen Parasu,Jon Jacobson,Olufemi Ayeni,Brad Petrisor,Rajesh Chakravertty,Sheila Sprague,Mohit Bhandari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1605-8

2013-04-07

Skeletal Radiology

Abstract:ObjectiveThe assessment of fracture healing following intertrochanteric fracture fixation is highly variable with no validated standards. Agreement with respect to fracture healing following surgery is important for optimal patient management. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess reliability of intertrochanteric fracture healing assessment and (2) determine if a novel radiographic scoring system for hip fractures improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons.Materials and methodsA panel of three radiologists and three orthopedic surgeons assessed fracture healing in 150 cases of intertrochanteric fractures at two separate time points to determine inter-rater and intra-rater agreement. Reviewers, blinded to the time after injury, first subjectively assessed overall healing using frontal and lateral radiographs for each patient at a single time point. Reviewers then scored each fracture using a Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) form to determine whether this improves agreement regarding hip fracture healing.ResultsInter-rater agreement for the overall subjective impression of fracture healing between reviewer groups was only fair (intraclass coefficient [ICC] = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.11–0.52. Use of the RUSH score improved overall agreement between groups to substantial (ICC = 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.53–0.75). Across reviewers, healing of the medial cortex and overall RUSH score itself demonstrated high correlations with overall perceptions of healing (r = 0.53 and r = 0.72, respectively).ConclusionsThe RUSH score improves agreement of fracture healing assessment between orthopedic surgeons and radiologists, offers a systematic approach to evaluating intertrochanteric hip fracture radiographs, and may ultimately provide prognostic information that could predict healing outcomes in patients with femoral neck fractures.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,orthopedics
Improving agreement in assessing subtrochanteric fracture healing among orthopedic surgeons using the Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH)

Tian Jian Zhou,Song Jiang,Jin Ke Ren,Xuan Zhang,Wang Xing Liu,Peng Yan,Jian Wang Li,Tong Zeng,Zhong Shi Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07902-3

IF: 2.562

2024-10-11

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Prompt identification of fracture healing is crucial for medical decision-making and clinical research. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) in subtrochanteric fractures and determine the optimal scoring threshold for fracture healing.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Reliability of Goldberg Scoring System in the Radiographic Evaluation of Bony Union after Bone Grafting

Young Choi,Young Hoon Yang,Young-Ho Kwon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4055/cios19152

Abstract:Background: Evaluation of bony union after bone grafting is very important in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to verify inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Goldberg scoring system for radiographic evaluation of bony union after bone grafting in various situations of animal models. Methods: Twenty-seven male C57/BL6 mice, which lack the ability to synthesize galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (GalT KO mice), and 9 C57/BL6 mice carrying a wild-type gene were used as animal models. We divided the mice into four groups. In group 1, syngenic bone grafting and intramedullary fixation were performed (9 wild type C57BL/6 mice). In group 2, allogenic bone grafting was performed (9 GalT KO mice). In group 3, an alpha-galactosidase-treated porcine xenograft was transplanted into the femur to reduce the antigenicity (9 GalT KO mice). In group 4, a non-treated porcine xenobone grafting was performed (9 GalT KO mice). The level of radiographic bony union (Goldberg method) was assessed by three orthopedic surgeons. Intra- and interobserver reliability for radiographic evaluation was assessed. Results: In the Goldberg scoring system, most of the radiographic measurements showed substantial to almost perfect intraobserver reliability. The total score showed substantial intraobserver reliability. The kappa coefficient (κ) of the first examiner was 0.603, the κ of the second examiner was 0.790, and the κ of the third examiner was 0.758. The scoring system showed substantial interobserver reliability. The κ of the first session was 0.641 and the κ of the second session was 0.649. Conclusions: The Goldberg scoring system is a reliable tool for radiographic evaluation of bony union after bone grafting.
Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails

Dane Brodke,Sai Devana,Adolfo Hernandez,Nathan O'Hara,Cynthia Burke,Jayesh Gupta,Natasha McKibben,Robert O'Toole,John Morellato,Hunter Gillon,Murphy Walters,Colby Barber,Paul Perdue,Graham Dekeyser,Lillia Steffenson,Lucas Marchand,Marshall James Fairres,Loren Black,Erika Roddy,Ashraf El Naga,Matthew Hogue,Trevor Gulbrandsen,Omar Atassi,Thomas Mitchell,Stephen Shymon,Zachary Working,Christopher Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002915

2024-09-26

Abstract:Objectives: This study aimed to profile modified Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (mRUST) scores over time in distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails and identify predictors of radiographic union timing and delayed progression. Methods: Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. Setting: Ten Level I Trauma Centers. Patient selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were patients with distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33A and 33C) treated with intramedullary nails, with a minimum follow-up of one year or until radiographic union or reoperation. The exclusion criteria were fractures treated with combination nail-plate constructs, pathologic fractures, and patients under 18 years old.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome was the mRUST score at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the optimal 3-month mRUST score predicting reoperation. Multivariable models were used to identify predictors of radiographic union timing and delayed progression. Results: The study included 155 fractures in 152 patients, with a mean patient age of 51 and a mean follow-up of 17 months. A 3-month mRUST score of ≤8 predicted reoperation with a PPV of 25%, and a NPV of 99%. The timing of radiographic union was associated with tobacco use (1.2 months later; p = 0.04), open fracture (1.4 months later; p = 0.04), and the use of topical antibiotics (2.1 months longer; 95% CI: 0.33 - 3.84; p = 0.02), however topical antibiotics was at high risk of being confounded by injury severity. Delayed progression to fracture healing, wherein the most rapid radiographic healing occurs more than 3 months post-operatively, was predicted by chronic kidney disease (p < 0.01). Conclusions: A 3-month mRUST score >8 suggests a very high likelihood of avoiding reoperation for nonunion.Tobacco use and open fractures were associated with a longer time to radiographic union. Chronic kidney disease is associated with a delayed radiographic progression, suggesting a need for adjusted expectations and management strategies in these patients. Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Displaced humeral shaft fractures: Assessment of fracture union and complications following dual plate fixation using an anterior approach

Jérémie Nallet,Clément Menez,François Loisel,Séverin Rochet,Daniel Lepage,Laurent Obert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111344

IF: 2.687

Injury

Abstract:The humeral bone is subject to torsional forces. In case of displaced shaft fractures, internal fixation remains the standard of care. This retrospective two-center study assessed the fracture union rate and complications after dual 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP) fixation using an anterolateral approach. Over a 9-year period, 38 patients underwent surgery in two centers. They had a mean age of 53.7 years (15-97, ± standard deviation (SD) 26) and there were three open fracture cases (7.9 %). The dominant side was affected in 21 cases (55.3 %) and there were 11 polytrauma patients (29 %). Mean operative time was 78 min (40-124, ± 19.8 SD). Patients were treated with dual 3.5 mm LCP fixation (6 screws on either side of the fracture line, anterolateral approach without a tourniquet). The first two orthogonal views showing at least 3 cortical bridges out of 4 determined fracture healing, as assessed by two independent raters. Pre- and postoperative complications were tabulated. Clinical outcomes included range of motion (ROM) and return to activities, while functional outcomes were assessed with the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Constant score, the Subjective Shoulder Score (SSV) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Four patients were given a shoulder immobilizer to wear for 3 weeks; immediate mobilization was the standard of care for the other patients. Fracture union was achieved in all cases within a mean of 11.7 weeks (6-28 ± 7.1 SD) without any heterotopic ossification of the brachialis muscle. There were eight patients with preoperative radial nerve palsy and two cases of postoperative palsy. There was one surgical site infection (2.6 %). Return to work for active patients was possible in 87 % of cases within a mean of 23 weeks (6-72 ± 11 SD). The Constant score was 84.6 (35-100, ± 13.4 SD), the SSV score was 80.7 (60-100, ± 8.2 SD), the DASH score was 13.5 (0-38.3, ± 8.8 SD) and the MEPS score was 85 (55-100, ± 11.9 SD). Traditional fixation methods provide little control over torsional forces, leading to non-union rates between 3 % and 12 % and delayed union (12 to 20 weeks). The simplicity of the technique described here, and the short operative time, may help explain the low infection rate. Dual plate fixation makes it possible to use more screws and allows nerve exploration and decompression in case of preoperative nerve palsy. Dual plate fixation to treat humeral shaft fractures is a simple and reliable technique.
Radiographic Evaluation of Distal Radius Fracture Healing by Time: Orthopedist versus Qualitative Assessment of Image Processing

Maria Oulianski,Dana Avraham,Omri Lubovsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare2030040

2022-09-05

Trauma Care

Abstract:Distal radius fractures are among the most prevalent long-bone fractures in the body. Fracture healing assessment is based on clinical evaluation and radiological examinations. A lack of consensus exists regarding the radiographic criteria for fracture union. Our work examined the commonly used criteria for the assessment of fracture healing. Thirty-two patients, conservatively treated for distal radius fracture, participated in a prospective study. Enrolled patients followed protocol for 26 weeks. Four orthopedic surgeons with similar ranks were asked to evaluate three parameters of radiographic measurements for each set of radiographs, including callus formation, the presence of a fracture line, and bridging of fracture sites or sites of fracture edges in 70 radiographs. Ten patients were eligible for the study. The degree of agreement among surgeons was “good” (Cronbach’s alpha): callus formation—0.8, bridging of fracture sites—0.775, blurring of fracture line gap—0.795. A timeline based on the specific week and grading system was made. Radiographic detection of callus formation was seen after the second film, between 6 and 9 weeks, and an agreement among surgeons was achieved for more than half of the patients for the blurring of the fracture gap. The radiographic healing progression of the distal radius can be detected after 6 and 9 weeks in all three parameters with good agreement between different surgeons. A timeline graph such as the one that was made in this model can be used for the follow-up of patients’ fracture healing or early detection of non-union.
Measurement of Radiological Parameters of Distal Radius Fracture Using the Ulnar Axis Compared with the Radial Axis

Pravit Kitidumrongsook,Pobe Luangjarmekorn,Vanasiri Kuptniratsaikul,Theephop Teeragananan,Sirisak Chaitantipongse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500164

Abstract:Background: The long axis of the radius is a standard reference for measuring radiological parameters in distal radius fractures. However, in patients with severe comminution and anatomical variation with distal radius bowing, it is challenging to assess using the long axis of the radius. The long axis of the ulna can be used as an alternative reference. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and level of agreement using the long axis of the ulna as an alternative reference in comparison to the long axis of the radius. Methods: Posteroanterior (PA) radiography of the wrist in patients with acute distal radius fractures was evaluated in two rounds by four observers. Radial height, radial inclination and ulnar variance were measured using radial and ulnar long axis as references. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the measurements with two reference axes was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The level of agreement was determined using the Bland-Altman plot. Results: In total, 59 patients who underwent PA radiography of the wrist were included in this study. All parameters exhibited good agreement between the two methods, with a mean difference of nearly zero (radial height = -0.03 mm, radial inclination = -0.14° and ulnar variance = 0.03 mm). The limits of agreement in radial height (-2.87, 2.82 mm) and ulnar variance (-0.81, 0.87 mm) were narrow. However, for the radial inclination, it was wider (-6.21, 5.94°). Intraobserver reliability between the long axis of radius and ulna (ICC = 0.85-0.99 and 0.84-0.98, respectively) was good to excellent. The interobserver reliability of each parameter was excellent (ICC = 0.94-0.97). Conclusions: The ulnar long axis can be used as an alternative reference for measuring radial height, radial inclination and ulnar variance in PA radiography of the wrist in acute distal radius fracture, particularly if the radial long axis is distorted. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).
Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Treatment Type

Chrystina L James,Jager Haan,Susan G Wager,Yash Hegde,Trevor D Wolterink,Stephanie Muh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58658

2024-04-20

Cureus

Abstract:PURPOSE: Humeral shaft fractures are common orthopedic injuries, representing 1-5% of all fractures. There is conflicting literature regarding the superiority of operative versus nonoperative treatment of these fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine functional outcomes and time to radiographic union in humeral shaft fractures with the hypothesis that both would be improved in patients treated operatively relative to those treated nonoperatively.METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined patients with humeral shaft fractures treated at a single large healthcare system between 2010 and 2020. A chart and radiograph review were performed to collect information on demographics, fracture, treatment, and outcome information. These measures were compared between patients treated operatively and nonoperatively.RESULTS: Five hundred seventeen adult patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified; 233 were treated nonoperatively, and 284 were treated operatively. The mean patient age was 50.2 years in those who underwent surgery relative to 59.9 years in those treated without surgery (P<0.001). Operatively-treated patients had significantly faster time to radiographic union at a median of 113 days compared to a median of 161 days in nonoperatively-treated patients (P=0.001). The operative group was made weight-bearing as tolerated significantly faster than the nonoperative group (84 days versus 98 days, respectively, P=0.002). No statistically significant difference was seen between the two treatment groups in rates of complications or range of motion at the time of radiographic union. However, patients who underwent surgery were found to be up to two times more likely to achieve full shoulder forward elevation by the time of their final follow-up than those treated without surgery (P=0.011).CONCLUSION: Patients with humeral shaft fractures treated operatively have faster time to union, earlier weight bearing, and no change in the rate of complications compared to patients treated nonoperatively.
Computed tomography for the detection of distal radioulnar joint instability: normal variation and reliability of four CT scoring systems in 46 patients

Mathieu Wijffels,Wouter Stomp,Pieta Krijnen,Monique Reijnierse,Inger Schipper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2455-y

2016-08-24

Skeletal Radiology

Abstract:ObjectivesThe diagnosis of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability is clinically challenging. Computed tomography (CT) may aid in the diagnosis, but the reliability and normal variation for DRUJ translation on CT have not been established in detail. The aim of this study was to evaluate inter- and intraobserver agreement and normal ranges of CT scoring methods for determination of DRUJ translation in both posttraumatic and uninjured wrists.Materials and methodsPatients with a conservatively treated, unilateral distal radius fracture were included. CT scans of both wrists were evaluated independently, by two readers using the radioulnar line method, subluxation ratio method, epicenter method and radioulnar ratio method. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed and normal values were determined based on the uninjured wrists.ResultsNinety-two wrist CTs (mean age: 56.5 years, SD: 17.0, mean follow-up 4.2 years, SD: 0.5) were evaluated. Interobserver agreement was best for the epicenter method [ICC = 0.73, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.79]. Intraobserver agreement was almost perfect for the radioulnar line method (ICC = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.77–0.87). Each method showed a wide normal range for normal DRUJ translation. Normal range for the epicenter method is −0.35 to −0.06 in pronation and −0.11 to 0.19 in supination.ConclusionDRUJ translation on CT in pro- and supination can be reliably evaluated in both normal and posttraumatic wrists, however with large normal variation. The epicenter method seems the most reliable. Scanning of both wrists might be helpful to prevent the radiological overdiagnosis of instability.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,orthopedics
Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems

Giuseppe Marongiu,Lorenzo Leinardi,Stefano Congia,Luca Frigau,Francesco Mola,Antonio Capone

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-0543-1

2020-03-12

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract:Abstract Background The classification systems for proximal humeral fractures routinely used in clinical practice include the Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 2007 systems. Currently used systems have low inter- and intraobserver reliability. In 2018, AO/OTA introduced a new classification system with the aim of simplifying the coding process, in which the Neer four-part classification was integrated into the fracture description. The aim of the present work is to assess the inter- and intraobserver agreement of the new AO/OTA 2018 compared with the Neer and AO/OTA 2007 classifications. Materials and methods A total of 116 radiographs of consecutive patients with proximal humeral fracture were selected and classified by three observers with different levels of experience. All three observers independently reviewed and classified the images according to the Neer, AO/OTA 2007, and new AO/OTA 2018 systems. To determine the intraobserver agreement, the observers reviewed the same set of radiographs after an interval of 8 weeks. The inter- and intraobserver agreement were determined through Cohen’s kappa coefficient analysis. Results The new AO/OTA 2018 classification showed substantial mean inter- ( k = 0.67) and intraobserver ( k = 0.75) agreement. These results are similar to the reliability observed for the Neer classification (interobserver, k = 0.67; intraobserver, k = 0.85) but better than those found for the AO/OTA 2007 system, which showed only moderate inter- ( k = 0.57) and intraobserver ( k = 0.58) agreement. The two more experienced observers showed better overall agreement, but no statistically significant difference was found. No differences were found between surgical experience and agreement regarding specific fracture types or groups. Conclusions The results showed that the Neer system still represents the more reliable and reproducible classification. However, the new AO/OTA 2018 classification improved the agreement among observers compared with the AO/OTA 2007 system, while still maintaining substantial descriptive power and simplifying the coding process. The universal modifiers and qualifications, despite their possible complexity, allowed a more comprehensive fracture definition without negatively affecting the reliability or reproducibility of the classification system. Level of evidence: Level III, diagnostic studies

orthopedics
The familial aplastic crisis in hereditary spherocytosis. Urocanic acid and formiminoglutamic acid excretion studies in a case with megaloblastic arrest.

I. Chanarin,D. Burman,M. Bennett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD.V20.1.33.33

IF: 20.3

1962-07-01

Blood

Abstract:A case of herditary spherocytosis who presented with an aregenerative crisis is reported. Evidence of megaloblastic hemopoiesis was present and was accompanied by the urinary excretion of large amounts of urocanic acid following oral dose of histidine hydrochloride. The severe illness in this patient was accompanied by a reticulocytopenia in a younger sister who, however, remained well clinically.
Correlation of radiological parameters with functional outcomes post fixation with proximal humerus locking plates

Bhavya Mathur,Sundar Suriyakumar,Karthikeyan Manickam,Mohamed Sameer,J K Giriraj Harshvardhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06324-z

Abstract:Purpose: Proximal humerus fractures account for 4-5% of all fractures in adults and affect females more than males. With the advent of special locking plates, the treatment trend has shifted more towards a surgical approach. These methods have produced good results but very high complications rates have been reported in the literature. This study was undertaken to analyse the radiological parameters which reflect towards a favourable long term functional outcome in order to advance the surgical fixation skills for managing fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. Materials and methods: 83 study participants with proximal humerus fracture fixed using proximal humerus locking plates were retrospectively analysed. The radiological parameters studied were neck shaft angle, head shaft angle, head diameter, head height, greater tuberosity to articular surface distance and reduction of the medial hinge with or without placement of calcar screw. The functional parameters assessed were the Constant Murley Score and range of movements of the shoulder joint. The patients were not followed further for the purpose of the study. Results: The mean Constant Murley Score for the participants was 80.75 ± 8.09 (range 60-90). The participants with good to excellent CM Score had a significantly higher neck shaft angle (107.47 ± 9.74 v/s 124.16 ± 10.68) and (-0.28 ± 0.85 v/s 2.37 ± 2.28), head shaft angle (23.09 ± 4.82 v/s 31.76 ± 7.76), head diameter (40.08 ± 8.63 v/s 45.15 ± 4.73), head height (18.77 ± 1.96 v/s 20.69 ± 2.76) and greater tuberosity to articular surface distance (-0.28±0.85 v/s 2.37±2.28) as compared to the patients with satisfactory and worse CM Score. The patients with a higher neck shaft angle and a maintained subacromial space had a better range of shoulder abduction. A higher rate of valgus collapse was seen with an inadequate medial hinge reduction. Conclusion: The radiological parameters which can predict towards a good functional outcome are a higher neck shaft angle and head shaft angle, a larger head diameter and head height, a superior position of the greater tuberosity in relation to the articular surface and a good medial hinge reduction.
Crystal structures of four co-crystals of (E)-1,2-di(pyridin-4-yl)ethene with 4-alkoxybenzoic acids: 4-methoxybenzoic acid–(E)-1,2-di(pyridin-4-yl)ethene (2/1), 4-ethoxybenzoic acid–(E)-1,2-di(pyridin-4-yl)ethene (2/1), 4-n-propoxybenzoic acid–(E)-1,2-di(pyridin-4-yl)ethene (2/1) and 4-n-butoxybenzo

Y. Tabuchi,Kazuma Gotoh,H. Ishida

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016017138

2016-10-28

Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications

Abstract:Crystal structures of four co-crystals of (E)-1,2-di(pyridin-4-yl)ethene with 4-alkoxybenzoic acids have been determined. Each compound comprises two acid molecules and one base molecule, which are held together by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming a linear hydrogen-bonded 2:1 unit.
Adaptation of cortical but not hippocampal NMDA receptors after chronic citalopram treatment.

Gabriel Nowak,Yong Li,Ian A. Paul

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(95)00585-4

IF: 5.195

1996-01-04

European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract:
Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Panagiotis T Masouros,George Mitrogiannis,Georgia Antoniou,Christina Chatzidaki,Dimitrios Kourtzis,Christos Garnavos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22227

2022-02-15

Cureus

Abstract:Objective To assess the interobserver agreement of the most widely used classification systems (Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA), and Luo) and investigate the impact of multiplane CT scans on their reliability. Methods Twelve raters (seven consultants and five senior trainees) were invited to classify 25 cases of tibial plateau fracture randomly selected out of a large database. Initially, they were asked to classify the fracture according to Schatzker, AO-OTA, and Luo based on plain anteroposterior (AP) X-ray and axial CT images. This procedure was applied for 25 cases consecutively. Next, the raters are given access to the multiplanar CT views of the same cases and were requested to reclassify each case. The interobserver agreement was calculated using the Fleiss kappa coefficient. Results An overall fair inter-rater agreement was observed for the Schatzker classification based on the plain AP X-ray (k=0.361) with a slight improvement after three-dimensional (3D) plane CT views (X-ray: k=0.361; 3D CT: k=0.364). For the AO-OTA classification, the relevant values were 0.204 and 0.231 based on plain X-ray and multiplanar CT, respectively. Finally, the Luo classification achieved the highest scores among the three classification systems (k=0.498), but its inter-rater agreement can still be characterized as moderate. No statistically significant improvement in the interobserver agreement was found for any classification even if only the consultants' subgroup was included in the data analysis. Conclusion All three classification systems failed to achieve a substantial agreement among the raters, with only a nonsignificant improvement after providing advanced imaging. This finding reflects the intrinsic weaknesses of the classification systems themselves rather than the disagreement on the fracture pattern due to unsatisfactory imaging.
Association of Patient-reported Outcomes With Clinical Outcomes After Distal Humerus Fracture Treatment

Abhiram R Bhashyam,Yassine Ochen,Quirine M J van der Vliet,Luke P H Leenen,Falco Hietbrink,Roderick M Houwert,George S M Dyer,Marilyn Heng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00122

2020-02-06

Abstract:In this study, we assessed the patient-reported outcomes of distal humerus fracture treatment using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) or QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores and the association between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 76 adult patients who sustained an acute distal humerus fracture between 2016 and 2018; 53 patients completed at least one patient-reported outcome measure used to assess physical function (PF) during their routine follow-up care (69.7% response rate). The average time to follow-up patient-reported outcome measure was 10.3 months. Patients completed the PROMIS PF 10a, PROMIS upper extremity (UE) 16a, and/or QuickDASH based on the treating institution/service. In addition, the PROMIS Global (Mental) subscale score was used as a measure of self-rated mental health. To assess clinical outcomes, we measured radiographic union, range of motion, and postoperative complications. Results: Most fractures were intra-articular (67.9%), and 84.9% were treated surgically. After treatment, 98.1% of fractures united radiographically. By the final follow-up, the average arc of motion was 18° to 122°. Average (±SD) PROMIS PF and UE scores were 41.7 ± 11.1 and 40.8 ± 12.4, respectively. The average QuickDASH score was 39.4 ± 26.5. The arc of flexion-extension and PROMIS Global (Mental) score were independently associated with PROMIS PF and PROMIS UE scores. Conclusions: We found that clinical factors (the arc of flexion-extension) and patient psychological factors (PROMIS Global [Mental] score) were independently associated with PROMIS measures of PF after distal humerus fracture treatment. These data can be used to contextualize patient outcomes and guide patient expectations.
Radiologic evaluation of fracture healing

Jessica S. Fisher,J. Jacob Kazam,Duretti Fufa,Roger J. Bartolotta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-018-3051-0

2018-09-21

Skeletal Radiology

Abstract:While assessment of fracture healing is a common task for both orthopedic surgeons and radiologists, it remains challenging due to a lack of consensus on imaging and clinical criteria as well as the lack of a true gold standard. Further complicating this evaluation are the wide variations between patients, specific fracture sites, and fracture patterns. Research into the mechanical properties of bone and the process of bone healing has helped to guide the evaluation of fracture union. Development of standardized scoring systems and identification of specific radiologic signs have further clarified the radiologist’s role in this process. This article reviews these scoring systems and signs with regard to the biomechanical basis of fracture healing. We present the utility and limitations of current techniques used to assess fracture union as well as newer methods and potential future directions for this field.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,orthopedics

Microdrepanocytic anemia in a Jewish Negro woman.

Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM) Demonstrates High Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability in Assessing Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing

Scoring of radiographic cortical healing with the radiographic humerus union measurement predicts union in humeral shaft fractures

The Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) predicts humeral shaft nonunion.

The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons

Improving agreement in assessing subtrochanteric fracture healing among orthopedic surgeons using the Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH)

Reliability of Goldberg Scoring System in the Radiographic Evaluation of Bony Union after Bone Grafting

Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails

Displaced humeral shaft fractures: Assessment of fracture union and complications following dual plate fixation using an anterior approach

Radiographic Evaluation of Distal Radius Fracture Healing by Time: Orthopedist versus Qualitative Assessment of Image Processing

Measurement of Radiological Parameters of Distal Radius Fracture Using the Ulnar Axis Compared with the Radial Axis

Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Treatment Type

Computed tomography for the detection of distal radioulnar joint instability: normal variation and reliability of four CT scoring systems in 46 patients

Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems

The familial aplastic crisis in hereditary spherocytosis. Urocanic acid and formiminoglutamic acid excretion studies in a case with megaloblastic arrest.

Correlation of radiological parameters with functional outcomes post fixation with proximal humerus locking plates

Adaptation of cortical but not hippocampal NMDA receptors after chronic citalopram treatment.

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Association of Patient-reported Outcomes With Clinical Outcomes After Distal Humerus Fracture Treatment

Radiologic evaluation of fracture healing