Abstract:BackgroundTrochanteric fractures usually require surgical treatment. The currently used classification system, such as AO classification, cannot cover all variant types, and is poor in reliability, causing confusion in surgical decision making. This study describes a simple, well-covered, re-liable, accurate, and clinically useful classification.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 907 patients with trochanteric fractures treated by us from 1,999 to 2019 and proposed a new classification according to radiographs. Then, 50 records randomly selected in proportion were examined by 10 observers (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) independently according to AO and the new classification. After a 2-week interval, repeat evaluation was completed. The Kappa coefficient was used to investigate the intra-observer reliability, inter-observer reliability and the agreement between the observers and the “reference standard”.ResultsThe new classification system includes 12 types composed of 3 medial groups and 4 lateral groups. According to the medial buttress, the fractures are divided into group I (intact lesser trochanter, adequate but-tress), group II (incomplete lesser trochanter, effective cortical buttress after reduction) and group III (huge defect of the medial cortex). According to the penetration region of the lateral fracture line, the fractures are divided into group A (intact lateral cortex), group B (incomplete lateral cortex), group C (subtrochanteric fractures) and group D (multiple lateral fracture lines). All of the included cases can be classified according to the new classification, of which 34 (3.75%) cases are unclassifiable by the AO classification. Intra-observer: The experienced achieved substantial agreement using both AO [k = 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.46–0.76)] and new classification [k = 0.65 (0.55–0.76)]. The inexperienced reached moderate agreement using both AO [k = 0.48 (0.33–0.62)] and new classification [k = 0.60 (0.50–0.71)]. Inter-observer: The overall reliabilities for AO [k = 0.51 (0.49–0.53)] and for new classification [k = 0.57 (0.55–0.58)] were both moderate. The agreement between the experienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.61 (0.49–0.74)] and new classification [k = 0.63 (0.54–0.72)] were both substantial. The agreement between the inexperienced and the reference standard according to AO [k = 0.48 (0.45–0.50)] and the new classification [k = 0.48 (0.41–0.54)] were both moderate.ConclusionCompared with AO classification, our new classification is better in coverage, reliability and accuracy, and has the feasibility of clinical verification and promotion.

Improving agreement in assessing subtrochanteric fracture healing among orthopedic surgeons using the Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH)

The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons

The Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures (RUSHU) predicts humeral shaft nonunion.

Reliability of Radiographic Union Scoring in Humeral Shaft Fractures

Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM) Demonstrates High Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability in Assessing Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing

Scoring of radiographic cortical healing with the radiographic humerus union measurement predicts union in humeral shaft fractures

Comparison of Percutaneous Compression Plating and Short Reconstruction Nail for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture

Radiographic Evaluation of Distal Radius Fracture Healing by Time: Orthopedist versus Qualitative Assessment of Image Processing

Radiologic evaluation of fracture healing

Radiographic analysis of the restoration of hip joint center following open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures: a retrospective cohort study

Factors affecting the outcome of surgical treatment for intertrochanteric fractures

Correlation Between 3 Instruments for Measurement of Surgical Outcomes of Tibial Plateau Fractures

Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails

The association of ICUC trauma score and quick DASH in a distal radius fracture cohort

Interobserver Reliability of Schatzker, AO Foundation-Orthopaedic Trauma Association, and Luo Classifications for Tibial Plateau Fractures: Does Three-Dimensional CT Improve Outcomes?

Subtrochanteric Fracture Treatment: A Retrospective Study Of 46 Patients

Surgical treatment of specific Unified Classification System B fractures: potentially destabilising lesser trochanter periprosthetic fractures

A comprehensive predictive model for postoperative joint function in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty patients: combining radiomics and clinical indicators

Progress on the surgical treatment of subtrochanteric fractures

Observation of the clinical efficacy of percutaneous reduction by leverage combined with intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fracture: a retrospective single-arm cohort study

Proposal and Validation of a New Classification for Trochanteric Fractures Based on Medial Buttress and Lateral Cortical Integrity.