Abstract:Background: A task force from the US National Institute of Health aimed to establish parameters for surveys with patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) by recommending the use of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System 29-item (PROMIS-29) questionnaire and the stratification according to the Impact Score. We aimed to assess the internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, construct validity and responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire (version 2.1) and the Impact Score in patients with chronic LBP. Methods: A prospective cohort study was carried out with patients with chronic LBP who were receiving physiotherapy treatment in clinics in São Paulo and Vitória cities, Brazil. The sample included 102 patients with chronic LBP, aged between 18 and 80 years, and with the ability to read and write in the Brazilian-Portuguese language. Exclusion criteria were patients with serious spinal conditions, cognitive impairment, pregnant women, and patients who had undergone lumbar surgery within the past six months. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire, the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire were applied. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire was reapplied after 24 hours and 4 weeks. Results: The PROMIS-29 questionnaire showed Cronbach's Alpha values between 0.81 (anxiety) and 0.91 (depression). The ICC2.1 ranged from 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.89) to 0,97 (CI 95%: 0.95 to 0.98). The SEM values ranged between 0.85 (physical function) and 2.62 (ability to participate in social roles and activities). The Impact Score showed Cronbach's Alpha, ICC2.1 and SEM values of 0.91, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.98) and 0.56, respectively. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score showed sufficient construct validity. The PROMIS-29 questionnaire showed moderate responsiveness, while the Impact Score showed sufficient responsiveness. Conclusions: Both the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score showed sufficient internal consistency, reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in Brazilian patients with chronic LBP. The results support the US National Institutes of Health's recommendation to use the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic LBP. We suggest that future studies evaluate the structural validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Czech version of the core outcome measures index for low back and neck pain

The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity

Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and establishment of the minimal clinically important change score of the European Portuguese core outcome measures index in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease

Slovenian Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Content Validation of the Updated Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Questionnaire on Health Problems (OSTRC-H2)

Simplified Chinese version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for patients with neck pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Lithuanian version of the Spine Functional Index

Translation, intercultural adaptation, and validation of the Slovak version of AOSpine patient reported outcome for spinal trauma tool

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oswestry disability index for Mexican population

Assessing the Functional Status of Patients with Chronic Pain-Cross Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire

Towards Standardized Assessment of Outcomes in Back Pain—Validation of Linking Studies Between Disease-Specific and Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Psychometric Testing of the Slovene Version of the Perceived Inventory of Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing

Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the PROMIS-29 questionnaire and the Impact Score in patients with chronic low back pain

Cross-cultural translation and measurement properties of the Polish version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

What can I do for my low back pain? The Work In Progress questionnaire!

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Finnish Version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire

Reliability and validity of Punjabi version of Oswestry Disability Index in patients with mechanical low back pain