Abstract:Background Context The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is widely utilized as a patient reported outcome (PRO) tool to assess patients presenting with low back pain (LBP) and following thoracolumbar spine surgery. No primary study has calculated the baseline range of ODI values in the diverse American population. Establishing age-adjusted normative values for ODI in the American population is crucial for assessing the utility of treatment strategies. Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe the baseline range of functional low back disability as measured by the ODI in an American population. Study Design/Setting Cross-Sectional Observational Study. Patient Sample A total of 1214 participants were recruited from the United States in January 2024 using a combination of the Connect and PrimePanel platforms by CloudResearch to complete a survey administered on a RedCap online database. The survey consisted of 10 demographic questions and the 10 ODI survey questions. The distribution of the survey was designed to obtain approximately 100 respondents in each of the following age groups: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80-89. The distribution of the sample was similarly designed to match the US Census racial data with 78.1% White, 13.9% Black, and 7.9% other. Outcome Measures Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Methods A crowd-sourcing platform called Cloudresearch was used to collect a representative sample of the US population by answering questions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), a 10-question survey. Results The final sample size was 797 participants including 386 (48.4%) males and 411 (51.6%) females; 169 participants were excluded that did not complete the survey and an additional 248 were excluded for failing attention check questions. The overall mean ODI score for the combined age groups was 14.35 (95% CI [13.33, 15.37]). The mean ODI scores increased with age, with the highest mean ODI in ages 70-79 at 18.0 (95% CI [14.76, 21.24]). Female participants reported higher mean ODI scores than their male counterparts in the 18-29 age group ( P = .01), 50-59 age group ( P = .01), and 60-69 age group ( P = .02). Additionally, a weak positive correlation was found between Body Mass Index (BMI) and ODI scores (r = 0.22, P < .001). Conclusion Our findings demonstrate a clear trend of increased disability with age. This study describes the baseline range of functional low back pain disability in the US population. By defining these parameters, healthcare professionals can better tailor age and sex-specific interventions to manage disability in the aging U.S. population, ultimately improving patient care and both operative and non-operative treatment plans for LBP-related thoracolumbar pathology.

Reliability and validity of Punjabi version of Oswestry Disability Index in patients with mechanical low back pain

Urdu version of Oswestry disability index; a reliability and validity study

Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oswestry disability index for Mexican population

Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Urdu version of Rand Short Form 36-item survey (SF-36) among patients with lumbar radiculopathy

Reliability and validity of Oswestry Disability Index among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index in Adult Spinal Deformity

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Urdu version of the back pain functional scale in low back pain patients

Describing Functional Low Back Pain Disability in the American Population: A Crowd-sourced Evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index.

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults with Low Back Pain?

Adaption and psychometric evaluation of the Hindi version of Neck Disability Index in the rural population of Northern India: A cross cultural study

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Hausa Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Mixed Rural and Urban Nigerian Populations with Low Back Pain

Translation and validation of urdu version short form-mcgill pain questionnaire-2

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a self-administered Urdu version of the child oral impacts on daily performances index among 11-12-year-old children in Lahore, Pakistan

Validity and Reliability of Simplified Chinese Version of Oswestry Disability Index with Chronic Low Back Pain Induced by Lumbar Chronic Paraspinal Compartment Syndrome

Psychometric Properties of Chosen Scales Evaluating Disability in Low Back Pain—Narrative Review

Cross-cultural adaption, reliability and validity of an Indian (Tamil) version for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index