Abstract:In Brief Study Design. A multicenter cross-cultural study to re-evaluate the reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Objective. To assess the concurrent validity and reliability of this instrument in mainland China. Summary of Background Data. The SRS-22 Questionnaire was developed to assess the health-related quality of life for patients with scoliosis in the United States. More recently, the reliability and validity analyses of traditional and simplified Chinese versions of this questionnaire were performed, respectively. However, with respect to the diversity of population and large proportion of rural patients in China, a multicenter study might be necessary to re-evaluate its adaptation. Methods. The original English version of the SRS-22 Questionnaire was translated into simplified Chinese. Considering the different health care systems in mainland China, the question 15 was modified; the respondent might be the parent if the patient was younger than 18 years. This multicenter study was performed by 13 scoliosis surgeons involving seven spine centers. The SRS-22 Questionnaire and a previously validated 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire were given to 391 patients with idiopathic scoliosis or congenital scoliosis without neurologic deficits. Of those, 136 patients were randomly selected for a second identical SRS-22 Questionnaire filled 1 week later and mailed back with a stamped return envelope. Results. A total of 333 patients fully completed both SRS-22 and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaires. Good consistency was observed for all the five domains of the SRS-22. Poorer internal consistency was found in questions 15 and 18. If question 15 was excluded, the α coefficient would increase to 0.68. The pain domain of SRS-22 had a high ceiling effect being 67.5%. The test-retest reproducibility was observed “good” in the pain domain and “excellent” for the remaining domains of SRS-22 Questionnaire. Good (10 domains) and moderate (23 domains) correlations were demonstrated while seven domains had poor correlation. Conclusion. The simplified Chinese version of the SRS-22 Questionnaire was re-evaluated by a multicenter study to respect the diversity of population and cultural differences in mainland China, which showed good internal consistency and satisfactory test-retest reproducibility. It might be useful for clinical evaluation of Chinese adolescents and young adults with scoliosis treated with bracing or surgery, although it also encountered previously reported difficulties with some of the items related to different cultures and health care systems. A multicenter cross-cultural adaptation of simplified Chinese Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire was evaluated for 333 patients including those treated with bracing or surgery in mainland China, showing good internal consistency and satisfactory test-retest reproducibility. It should be used to evaluate Chinese adolescents and young adults with scoliosis.

Simplified Chinese version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for patients with neck pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Czech version of the core outcome measures index for low back and neck pain

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) for Patients with Chronic Pain in Mainland China

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Slovenian version of the Core outcome measures index for low back pain

Psychometric Validation of the Adapted Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ)

Validating the preoperative Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index for the Neck and comparing quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament by the patient-reported outcome measures

Simplified Chinese Version of the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) for Patients with Low Back Pain

Measuring health-related quality of life in chronic otitis media in a Chinese population: cultural adaption and validation of the Zurich Chronic Middle Ear Inventory (ZCMEI-21-Chn)

Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and establishment of the minimal clinically important change score of the European Portuguese core outcome measures index in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

Validation of the Chinese version of the Head and Neck Patient Symptom Checklist for measuring nutrition impact symptoms during radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer

Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: A Methodological Systematic Review

Short Form of the Changes in Outlook Questionnaire: Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version.

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

The Chinese Mandarin COMHON Index and Braden Scale to assess pressure injury risk in intensive care: An inter-rater reliability and convergent validity study

Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in Mainland China: an Investigation of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric investigation of Chinese version of the Orbach & Mikulincer Mental Pain Scale in patients with depressive disorder

Re-evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale