Abstract:The evidential value of a unique DNA database match has been extensively discussed. In principle the matter has been mathematically resolved, since the posterior odds on the match being with the trace donor are unambiguously defined. There are multiple ways to express these odds as a product of likelihood ratio and prior odds, and so the mathematics do not immediately tell us what to do in concrete cases, in particular which likelihood ratio to choose for reporting. With p the random match probability for the matching person, if innocent, and n the database size, both 1/p, originating from a suspect-centered framework, and 1/(np), originating from a database-centered framework, arise as likelihood ratio. Both have been defended and both have been criticized in the literature. We will clarify the situation by not introducing models and choices of prior probabilities until they are needed. This allows to derive the posterior odds in their most general form, which applies whenever we know that a single person among a list is not excluded as potential trace donor. We show that we need only three probabilities, that pertain to the observed match, to the database, and to the matching person respectively. How these required probabilities behave in a given context, then, differs from one situation to another. This is understandable since database searches may be done under various circumstances. They may be carried out with or without a suspect already in mind and, depending on the operational procedures, one may or may not be informed about the personal details of the person who gives the match. We show how to evaluate the required probabilities in all such cases. We will motivate why we believe that for some database searches, the 1/p likelihood ratio is more natural, whereas for others, 1/(np) seems the more sensible choice. This is not motivated by the mathematics: mathematically, the approaches are equivalent. It is motivated by considering which model best reflects the actual situation, taking into account what question was asked to begin with, and by the practical consideration of judging which likelihood ratio comes closer to the posterior odds based on the information available in the case. This article is intended to be both a research and a review article, and we end with an in-depth discussion of various arguments that have been brought forward in favor or against either 1/p or 1/(np).

DNA database matches: A p versus np problem

The Controversies on Database Searching in the Statistical Evaluation of DNA

Encoding of low-quality DNA profiles as genotype probability matrices for improved profile comparisons, relatedness evaluation and database searches

On the limitations of probabilistic claims about the probative value of mixed DNA profile evidence

A nonparametric Bayesian approach to the rare type match problem

Searching national DNA databases with complex DNA profiles: an empirical study using probabilistic genotyping

Non parametric Bayesian approach to LR assessment in case of rare haplotype match

Evaluation of DNA Mixtures from Database Search.

Interpreting forensic DNA mixtures: allowing for uncertainty in population substructure and dependence

Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model

Paternity testing and other inference about relationships from DNA mixtures

PrivaMatch: A Privacy-Preserving DNA Matching Scheme for Forensic Investigation

Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence

On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing

Analysis of the genealogy process in forensic genetic genealogy

Analysis of the privacy-performance tradeoff of reference testing in Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy

DNA transfer in forensic science: A review

Evidentiary evaluation of single cells renders highly informative forensic comparisons across multifarious admixtures

A review of likelihood ratios in forensic science based on a critique of Stiffelman "No longer the Gold standard: Probabilistic genotyping is changing the nature of DNA evidence in criminal trials"

Assessing the Forensic Value of DNA Evidence from Y Chromosomes and Mitogenomes

Computer Security Risks of Distant Relative Matching in Consumer Genetic Databases