Abstract:Introduction: Clinical documentation is the key determinant of inpatient acuity of illness and payer reimbursement. Every inpatient hospitalization is placed into a diagnosis related group with a relative value based on documented procedures, conditions, comorbidities and complications. The Case Mix Index (CMI) is an average of these diagnosis related groups and directly impacts physician profiling, medical center profiling, reimbursement, and quality reporting. We hypothesize that a focused, physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation of vascular surgery inpatients results in increased CMI and contribution margin. Methods: A physician-led coding initiative to educate physicians on the documentation of comorbidities and conditions was initiated with concurrent chart review sessions with coding specialists for 3 months, and then as needed, after the creation of a vascular surgery documentation guide. Clinical documentation and billing for all carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and open infrainguinal procedures (OIPs) performed between January 2013 and July 2016 were stratified into precoding and postcoding initiative groups. Age, duration of stay, direct costs, actual reimbursements, contribution margin (CM), CMI, rate of complication or comorbidity, major complication or comorbidity, severity of illness, and risk of mortality assigned to each discharge were abstracted. Data were compared over time by standardizing Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) values for each diagnosis related group and using a CMS base rate reimbursement. Results: Among 458 CEA admissions, postcoding initiative CEA patients (n = 253) had a significantly higher CMI (1.36 vs 1.25; P = .03), CM ($7859 vs $6650; P = .048), and CMS base rate reimbursement ($8955 vs $8258; P = .03) than precoding initiative CEA patients (n = 205). The proportion of admissions with a documented major complication or comorbidity and complication or comorbidity was significantly higher after the coding initiative (43% vs 27%; P < .01). Among 504 OIPs, postcoding initiative patients (n = 227) had a significantly higher CMI (2.23 vs 2.05; P < .01), actual reimbursement ($23,203 vs $19,909; P < .01), CM ($12,165 vs $8840; P < .01), and CMS base rate reimbursement ($14,649 vs $13,496; P < .01) than precoding initiative patients (n = 277). The proportion of admissions with a documented major complication or comorbidity and complication or comorbidity was significantly higher after the coding initiative (61% vs 43%; P < .01). For both CEA and OIPs, there were no differences in age, duration of stay, total direct costs, or primary insurance status between the precoding and postcoding patient groups. Conclusions: Accurate and detailed clinical documentation is required for key stakeholders to characterize the acuity of inpatient admissions and ensure appropriate reimbursement; it is also a key component of risk-adjustment methods for assessing quality of care. A physician-led documentation initiative significantly increased CMI and CM.

Addition of Efficiency Measures to Current Accuracy Measures in the Vascular Laboratory Can Be Used for Future Accreditation and Payment Models

Operational Efficiency and Productivity Improvement Initiatives in a Large Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

A-339 Timely Audits and Open Communications are key to Improved Device Result Transmission and Reduction of Potential Errors at the Point of Care

Individual quality improvement in acute coronary syndromes: a performance improvement initiative

A physician-led initiative to improve clinical documentation results in improved health care documentation, case mix index, and increased contribution margin

Minimizing delays to hemodialysis access maturation: A quality improvement analysis

Improving Arthroplasty Efficiency and Quality Through Concentrating Service Volume by Complexity: Surviving the Medicare Policy Changes

Abstract TMP42: Reducing 30-day Stroke Readmissions Using a Multi-Step Quality Improvement Approach

Abstract 18105: Lean Six Sigma Approach to Improve Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Cardiac Rehab Referral Rates

Getting mammograms shouldn’t be so bumpy: Improving mammogram workflow in VA community care.

Optimizing workflow of urgent stroke endovascular intervention: A focused lean six sigma project

Abstract WMP35: What's Your Time Worth?: Improving Efficiency in Tracking Core Measures Compliance in Real Time

Using Technology to Support Measurement-Based Care: Design and Implementation of the Measurement-Assisted Care Program

ACCF/AHA/ACR/SCAI/SIR/SVM/SVN/SVS 2010 Performance Measures for Adults with Peripheral Artery Disease

A Quality Guarantee in Acute Coronary Syndromes: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice Program Taken Real-Time

Enhanced Safety and Efficiency of Ambulatory Cardiology Admissions: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Cardiovascular point of care initiative: enhancements in clinical data management

Abstract TP50: Ensuring Safe Post-Procedure Throughput for CEA and CAS Patients

Performance Improvement Utilizing Multidisciplinary Collaborations and Analytics Are the Key Drivers in Paradigm Shift From Volume to Value in Improving Test Utilization, Patient Safety, and Quality of Care

Abstract WMP25: Implementing a Rapid Response Model to Improve Efficiency of In-Hospital Stroke Code Processes

Abstract TP409: Continuous Quality Improvement Implementation Across a Large Stroke Network of Affiliated Rural Hospitals