Implementation of a High-Value, Evidence-Based Care Program: Impact and Opportunities for Learning Organizations
Stephen B Williams,Peter McCaffrey,David Reynoso,Phillip Keiser,Rick Trevino,John Heymann,Gulshan Doulatram,Abe DeAnda,Timothy J Harlin,Gulshan Sharma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-23-00099
Abstract:Goal: Value-based care is not simply a matter of cost, but also one of outcomes and harms per dollar spent. This definition encompasses three key components: healthcare delivery that is organized around patients' medical conditions, costs and outcomes that are actively and consistently measured, and information technology that enables the other two components. Our objective in this project was to implement and measure a systemwide high-value, evidence-based care initiative with five pillars of high-value practices. Methods: We performed a quasi-experimental study from September 1, 2019, to August 31, 2022, of a new care program at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Drawing from the ABIM Foundation's Choosing Wisely Campaign, the program was based on five pillars-blood management and antimicrobial, laboratory, imaging, and opioid stewardship-with interdisciplinary teams led by institutional subject matter experts (i.e., administrative leaders) accompanied by nursing, information technology, pharmacy, and clinical and nonclinical personnel including faculty and trainees. Each pillar addressed two goals with targeted interventions to assess improvements during the first three fiscal years (FYs) of implementation. The targets were set at 10% improvement by the end of each FY. Monthly measurements were recorded for each FY. Principal findings: We tracked performance toward 30 pillar goals and determined that the teams were successful in 50%, 50%, and 70% of their goals for FY 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. For example, in the antimicrobial stewardship FY 2021 pillar, one goal was to decrease meropenem days of therapy (DOT) by 10% (baseline was 45 DOT/1,000 patient days; the target was 40.5 DOT/1,000 patient days). We measured quarterly DOT/1,000 patient day rates of 32.02, 30.57, and 26.9, respectively, for a cumulative rate of 26.9. Critical interventions included engaging and empowering providers and service lines (including outliers whose performance was outside norms), educational conferences, and transparent data analyses. Practical applications: We showed that a multidisciplinary approach to the implementation of an evidence-based, high-value care program through a partnership of engaged administrative leaders, providers, and trainees can result in sustainable and measurable high-value healthcare delivery. Specifically, structuring the program with pillars to address defined metrics resulted in progressive improvement in meeting value-based goals at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Also, challenges can be embraced as learning opportunities to inform value-based interventions that range from technological to educational tactics. The results at the University of Texas Medical Branch provide a benchmark for the implementation of a program that engages, empowers, and aligns innovative value-based care initiatives.