Abstract:(1) Background: Various guidelines address patient preparation and its importance for venous blood sampling, such as the GP41 guideline issued by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the blood collection guidelines published by the World Health Organisation. Recommendations provided by national societies or international organisations in the field of radiology, such as The Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, or in the field of laboratory medicine, such as the Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and the Latin American Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE-LATAM) of the Latin American Confederation of Clinical Biochemistry (COLABIOCLI), also guide this practice. There is a notable lack of understanding regarding the viewpoints held by non-laboratory healthcare professionals concerning the significance of patient preparation for laboratory testing and the impact of typical factors associated with patient preparation. This study endeavours to bridge this gap by assessing the attitude of non-laboratory healthcare professionals in Lithuania regarding these pivotal aspects. (2) Methods: A self-designed anonymous questionnaire was disseminated among 141 public healthcare institutions in Lithuania. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated by computing Cronbach's alpha. Descriptive statistics were utilised for the variables, while comparisons of attitude among groups were conducted using Mann–Whitney U (for two groups) or Kruskal–Wallis (for more than two groups) for categorical and discrete indicators. The Kruskal–Wallis post-hoc test was employed for pairwise comparisons. A significance level of p-Value < 0.05 was applied to establish statistical significance. (3) Results: A total of 158 respondents constituted two distinct groups of healthcare professionals: nurses and physicians. Most of the participants either agreed or strongly agreed that patient preparation could introduce bias into laboratory test results. Professionals with less than 20 years of work experience or those who attended training in patient preparation for sampling within a 5-year timeframe exhibited stronger agreement regarding different preanalytical factors in patient preparation and their impact on laboratory test results compared to their counterparts. (4) Conclusions: Non-laboratory healthcare professionals who participated in this survey consider proper patient preparation for laboratory testing to be a significant step towards obtaining accurate test results. They also recognize the commonly acknowledged preanalytical factors as important for ensuring reliable test results. However, attitudes towards the importance of several preanalytical factors vary depending on whether non-laboratory healthcare professionals have more or less than 20 years of work experience, as well as whether they have attended any training on this topic within the last five years or have never attended such training.

Transition of care in inflammatory bowel disease: mind the gap! Theory, practice and recommendations for an Australian context

Revisiting the Environmental Impact of Inappropriate Clinical Laboratory Testing: A Comprehensive Overview of Sustainability, Economic, and Quality of Care Outcomes

Critical test result management at Danish hospital laboratories: a national survey

Laboratory stewardship perceptions and testing patterns at a pediatric tertiary care center

External quality assessment performance in ten countries: an IFCC global laboratory quality project

Repeated coaxial colonic stenting in the palliative management of benign colonic obstruction.

Clinical laboratory: bigger is not always better

Assessment of Culture and Laboratory Practices Related to Patient Safety in Brazilian Laboratories

Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: state-of-the-art, quality specifications and future strategies

Performance Improvement Utilizing Multidisciplinary Collaborations and Analytics Are the Key Drivers in Paradigm Shift From Volume to Value in Improving Test Utilization, Patient Safety, and Quality of Care

A survey of patients’ views from eight European countries of interpretive support from Specialists in Laboratory Medicine

Sharing reference intervals and monitoring patients across laboratories – findings from a likely commutable external quality assurance program

Improved implementation of medical tests - barriers and opportunities

Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference

BENCHMARKING AS AN IMPORTANT METHOD FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ON THE «CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY AND HEMATOLOGY» PROFILE MODEL

Critical Results in Laboratory Medicine

Nurse‐sensitive quality and benchmarking in hospitals striving for Magnet® or Pathway® designation: A qualitative study

Benchmarking in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of metric development and validation

Assessing Non-Laboratory Healthcare Professionals' Attitude towards the Importance of Patient Preparation for Laboratory Tests

Improving laboratory turnaround times in clinical settings: A systematic review of the impact of lean methodology application

Extracellular matrix fibrils and cell contacts in the chick embryo