Abstract:Objectives. The jaw angle plays an important role in facial beauty. Therefore, this study is aimed at comparatively determining the range of most attractive female intergonial widths and gonial heights on Perceptometric frontal-view and three-quarter-view images, from the perspective of orthodontists, oral maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons, and laypeople of different ages and sexes. Methods. This prospective multivariate Perceptometric study was performed on 4191 esthetic scores given by 127 individuals to 33 Perceptometric face images. Frontal view and three-quarter-view photographs of a normal young woman were modified by image editing software to create two Perceptometric sets, one for the 24 gradual changes of intergonial width on the frontal view, and the other for the 9 vertical changes of the jaw angle on the three-quarter view. An online questionnaire was designed including 24 frontal and 9 oblique view photographs. The questionnaires' internal consistencies were almost perfect. Enrolled were 127 raters, including 33 orthodontists, 32 OMF surgeons, and 62 laypeople. The esthetics of different images were compared across different professions, across different ages, and between the sexes using 2-way MANCOVA, ANCOVA, and Bonferroni; the zones of esthetic jaw angles and also the sensitivity of judges to Perceptometric anatomical changes were assessed using 2-way RM-ANCOVA and Bonferroni ( α = 0.05 , α = 0.0056 , α = 0.0021 , and β = 0.05 ). Results. Orthodontists and surgeons gave the highest attractiveness scores to intergonial: interzygomatic ratio of 72.53%, while the best ratio was 74.45% for the laypeople. The range of beautiful intergonial is as follows: interzygomatic ratio was 72.53% to 86.03%. OMF surgeons and orthodontists gave the highest score to a gonial height of 4.5 mm above the mouth corner, while the laypeople gave the highest score to the gonial height of 4.5 mm below the mouth corner. The range of beautiful gonial height was from 4.5 mm above the mouth corner to 9 mm below the mouth corner. The education of observers may affect their perception of beauty; orthodontists tended differ from laypeople, overall and also specifically in the case of the highly attractive frontal images concerning the intergonial width changes. However, no such differences were detected between surgeons with orthodontists or laypeople. Although age did not affect the overall esthetic scores, it did affect the sensitivity of the judges to the anatomic changes. So did expertise, i.e., the expertise of judges affected their sensitivity to anatomical changes; orthodontists showed steeper slopes of esthetic preference alterations to anatomical changes, while laypeople had the gentlest slope of preference changes. Judges' sex did not affect either their overall esthetic preferences or their sensitivity to anatomic changes. Conclusion. Narrower female jaw angles and jaw angles that are vertically close to the level of the mouth corner may be unanimously more desirable. Thus, treatments aiming at widening the jaw angle of a woman or lowering it should be discouraged, at least in Persians. Orthodontists, but not surgeons, are more sensitive than laypeople to anatomic changes of the jaw angle. The judges' age can affect this perceptive sensitivity, but their sex cannot.

Contribution of the mandible position to the facial profile perception of a female facial profile: An eye-tracking study

How Facial Cues of Models Affect Attention to Websites in Asian and American Cultures

Study of the relationship between facial anatomical marking points and occlusal vertical dimension

Clinician, Dental Student, and Orthognathic Patient Perception of Black-and-white Silhouette Lateral Profile Dimensions of Ideal Chin Position in a Chinese Population.

Harmonizing soft tissue subnasale and chin position in a forehead-based framework: interracial commonalities and differences between Asian and Caucasian females

Influence of facial width on the perception of lip protrusion and its differences between profile and 3-dimensional video clip

Craniofacial features and incisor position design of esthetics population after orthodontic treatment

Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.

Cephalometric analysis of chin soft tissue on Angle Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion with different vertical skeletal craniofacial patterns

Three-dimensional Facial Morphological Features of Young Han Chinese Women: A Preliminary Study

Beyond Smiles: Static Expressions in Maxillary Protrusion and Associated Positivity

The relationship between soft and hard tissue profiles in Angle three malocclusions

Subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional simulated images among the orthodontists and laypersons: a cross-sectional study

Psychometric and Perceptometric Comparisons of the Perspectives of Orthodontists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Laypeople of Different Ages and Sexes towards Beauty of Female Jaw Angles (Intergonial Widths and Gonial Heights) on Frontal and Three-Quarter Views

Evaluation of the Influence of Nasolabial Angle, Upper Sulcus Depth, and Nasal Tip Protrusion in the Perception of Facial Attractiveness

The Lower Bow-Shaped Curve As a Novel Reference Frame to Determine the Lateral Limit of the Maxillary Anterior Arch for Smile Esthetics.

Visual Attention, Bias, and Social Dispositions Toward People With Facial Anomalies: A Prospective Study With Eye-Tracking Technology

Analysis of soft tissue display in Chinese subjects during an enjoyment smile.

Evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class III patients undergoing camouflage orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study

An Internet Evaluation of Chinese Public Preferences for Asymmetrically Altered Incisor Angulations

Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-Of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness