Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the anteroposterior (AP) position and inclination of the maxillary incisors in subjects with class I normal occlusion and a harmonious profile with patients with skeletal class III malocclusions, and to investigate the changes in maxillary incisor inclination and AP position after surgical-orthodontic treatment in class III patients.Material and methods: Sixty-five subjects (35 female and 30 male; mean age: 21.8 +/- 3.89 years) with normal profiles and class I skeletal and dental patterns were selected as a control sample. Sixty-seven patients (38 female and 29 male; mean age: 21.3 +/- 3.31 years) with skeletal and dental class III malocclusions who sought surgical-orthodontic treatment were used as the study sample. Subjects were asked to smile and profile photographs were taken with the head in a natural position and the maxillary central incisors and the forehead in full view; cephalograms were taken and superimposed on the profile pictures according to the outline of the forehead and nose. Forehead inclination, maxillary incisor facial inclination and the AP position of the maxillary central incisor relative to the forehead (FAFFA) were measured on the integrated images and statistical analyses were performed.Results: In both groups, there were no significant male/female differences in either the maxillary central incisor inclination or AP position. Female subjects had a significantly steeper forehead inclination compared with males (P < 0.001) in both groups. After combined surgical-orthodontic treatment, the significant labial inclination (P < 0.001) and posterior positioning (P < 0.001) of the maxillary central incisors had been corrected to close to normal range (P> 0.05). In the control group, 84.6% had the facial axial point (FA) of their maxillary central incisors positioned between lines through the forehead facial axis (FFA) point and the glabella. In the study group, however, 79.1% had the maxillary central incisors positioned posterior to the line through the FFA point and the difference with the control group was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The position of the maxillary central incisors was strongly correlated with forehead inclination in the control sample (r(2) = 0.456; P < 0.01), but only a poor correlation was detected in the class III group (r(2) = 0.177; P> 0.05).Conclusions: With the integrated radiograph photograph method, the lateral cephalogram was reoriented, which makes it possible to accurately measure the variables on profile photographs. The AP position and inclination of the maxillary central incisors relative to the forehead plays an important role in the esthetics of the profile during smiling and could be an important variable to be considered during diagnosis and treatment planning. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Craniofacial features and incisor position design of esthetics population after orthodontic treatment

Evaluation of Change in the Facial Profile and Aesthetics in Relation to Incisor Position in Both Maxillary and Mandibular Arches

Changes in Anteroposterior Position and Inclination of the Maxillary Incisors after Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusions.

Evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class III patients undergoing camouflage orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study

Effect of maxillary incisor labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position on smiling profile esthetics.

Impact of Orthodontic-Induced Facial Morphology Changes on Aesthetic Evaluation: a Retrospective Study

A Coupled-Lines System to Determine the Anteroposterior Position of Maxillary Central Incisors for Smiling Profile Esthetics

The maxillary incisor display at rest: analysis of the underlying components

Correlation Between Gingival Phenotype in the Aesthetic Zone and Craniofacial Profile—a CBCT-based Study

Perception of facial esthetics and cephalometric correlations in Class II patients: a comparison between two-phase and one-phase treatments

Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.

Facial profile evaluation and prediction of skeletal class II patients during camouflage extraction treatment: a pilot study

Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study

Changes in smile parameters after surgical-orthodontic treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion

Evaluation of Aesthetic Anteroposterior Position of Maxillary Incisors in Patients with Extraction Treatment Using Facial Reference Lines

Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-Of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness

Correlations Between Objective Measurements and Subjective Evaluations of Facial Profile after Orthodontic Treatment

Aesthetic Evaluation of the Labiolingual Position of Maxillary Lateral Incisors by Orthodontists and Laypersons

Analysis of maxillary teeth and soft tissue profiles among Tibetan and Han Chinese females with facial symmetry for orthodontic treatment planning

A Retrospective Study on the Role of the Upper Incisor Position and a Morphological Evaluation of the Anterior Nasal Spine

Analysis of Facial Features and Prediction of Lip Position in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Adult Patients Undergoing Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment