The Lower Bow-Shaped Curve As a Novel Reference Frame to Determine the Lateral Limit of the Maxillary Anterior Arch for Smile Esthetics.

Ye Tian,Gao Huang,Xiang,Ning Wang,Wenyu Dai,Jiajun Chen,Rui Shu,Ding Bai,Hui Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.02.010
IF: 2.711
2022-01-01
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Abstract:Introduction: Smile analysis in horizontally angled views is indispensable for esthetic assessment and could reveal teeth-to-lip disharmony, which might escape discovery in the frontal and profile views. However, evidence is lacking on where the anterior teeth should be positioned for esthetics in angled smiles. Methods: Based on 3-dimensional facial image processing and geometric analysis, the lip edges were projected to the horizontal plane, and the horizontal teeth-to-lip relation was simplified and represented by the distances from dental landmarks to lower bow-shaped curves (LBSC), with the distance from facial-axis (FA) point of the canine to LBSC (FA-tangent line [TL] distance) identified as the key parameter. Using photographic modification and esthetic assessment, the effect of FA-TL distances on the attractiveness of 45 degrees angled smiles was tested, with esthetic ranges identified. A simplified method was developed to obtain the estimative LBSC and FA-TL distances using 2-dimensional photographs and geometric analysis to facilitate clinical application. Results: The FA-TL distance remarkably affected the esthetics of 45 degrees angled smiles. Smiles were attractive when the FA-TL distance ranged from -1.0 to 1.5 mm perceived by orthodontists and from -1.5 to 1.5 mm perceived by laypersons. The 2-dimensional photograph-derived estimative FA-TL distance was not significantly different from that obtained in a 3-dimensional image, validating the simplified method. Conclusions: The LBSC could serve as a reference frame to determine the lateral limit of the maxillary anterior arch for the esthetics of 45 degrees angled smiles. The FA-TL distance, which represented the spatial relation of the maxillary canine with the lower lip, was an esthetically essential parameter. For females aged 20-30 years, the FA point of the maxillary canines should be positioned no more than 1.5 mm labial or lingual to the LBSC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?