Abstract:SIGNIFICANCE Systematic lighting assessments should be part of low vision evaluations. The LuxIQ has gained popularity as an assessment tool, but its reliability has not been examined independently and is necessary for evidence-based vision rehabilitation. PURPOSE Besides magnification, improved lighting levels are a common intervention in reading rehabilitation for individuals with low vision. Determining the appropriate lighting can be a complex and time-consuming task. The LuxIQ is a portable lighting assessment tool that can be used to systematically measure lighting preferences; however, there is little independent evidence to support its reliability in low vision rehabilitation. METHODS One hundred nine control subjects (age, 18 to 85 years) and 64 individuals with low vision (age, 27 to 99 years) adjusted both the luminance and color temperature parameters on the LuxIQ while viewing a sentence on the MNREAD at their preferred print size for continuous reading. After 30 minutes, they were asked to repeat the same measurements. RESULTS Using Bland-Altman plots, test-retest variability was calculated using the limits of agreement (LOAs). For illuminance, the LOA width was 2806 lux for control subjects and 2657 lux for visually impaired participants. For color temperature, the LOA width was 2807 K for control subjects and 2364 K for those with a visual impairment. Difference scores were centered near zero, indicating overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS The measurement of lighting preference lacks the precision necessary for clinical utility, given that the LOA for luminance ranged more than 2600 lux, with normally sighted and low vision participants. Such variability translates into a range of approximately ±40 or 50 W in an incandescent light bulb, depending on the luminance level, making it clinically difficult to narrow down the options for evidence-based lighting recommendations. Next steps are to examine whether the reading behavior of low vision clients is positively affected by interventions that are based on LuxIQ recommendations.

Limitations and Precautions in the Use of the Farnsworth-Munsell Dichotomous D-15 Test

Test time affects Farnsworth D15 outcomes in practiced, but not unpracticed, subjects with color vision deficiency

Can the Farnsworth D15 Color Vision Test Be Defeated through Practice?

Effect of Illumination on Colour Vision Testing with Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test: Customized Colour Vision Booth versus Room Illumination

[Clinical Classification of Degree of Deficiency in Color Defectiveness: Simulations by Changing the Total Number of Caps or Saturation of Farnsworth Dichotomous Test D-15]

A new computer-based Farnsworth Munsell 100-hue test for evaluation of color vision

A simple modification of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test for much faster assessment of color vision

Validation of a New Digital and Automated Color Perception Test

Computerized scoring and graphing of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue color vision test

Display color accuracy and the D15 color arrangement test: A modeling study

Novel color vision assessment tool: AIM Color Detection and Discrimination

Comparative analysis of four color vision screening tests benchmarked by anomaloscopy for detection and investigation of protanomaly and deuteranomaly

Psychophysical Evaluation of Congenital Colour Vision Deficiency: Discrimination between Protans and Deutans Using Mollon-Reffin’s Ellipses and the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue Test

Screen‐based Color Vision Test for Digital Quantification of Deutan Color Defects Using a Color‐calibrated Monitor

Experimental Validation of Colour Rendition Specification Criteria Based on ANSI/IES TM-30-18

Test-retest Variability of a Standardized Low Vision Lighting Assessment

The use of the Lanthony New Color Test in determining the effects of aging on color vision

Human Perceptions of Colour Rendition at Different Chromaticities

Colour Vision Changes across Lifespan: Insights from FM100 and CAD Tests

Consistency of secondary colour vision tests in transport industries

Response of Patients with Color Vision Defects to Worth 4-Dot and Duochrome Tests