Abstract:Significance: Clinicians who administer the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 test need to pay attention to the quality and quantity of lighting and the time that they allow for completion of the test, and all repeat attempts need to be included in reports on compliance with color vision standards. Purpose: The validity of the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 has been questioned because practice may allow significantly color vision-deficient subjects to pass. In this article, we review the influence of practice and other factors that may affect the performance. These relate to both the design and the administration of the test. Methods: We review the literature and present some calculations on limitations in the colorimetric design of the test, quantity and quality of lighting, time taken, and repeat attempts. Results: In addition to the review of the literature, color differences and luminance differences under selected sources are calculated, and the increases in luminance clues under some sources and for protanopes are illustrated. Conclusions: All these factors affect the outcome of the test and need specification and implementation if the test is to be applied consistently and equitably. We recommend the following: practitioners should never rely on a single color vision test regardless of the color vision standard; lighting should be Tcp '' 6500 K and Ra > 90; illuminance levels should be between 200 and 300 lux if detection of color vision deficiency is a priority or between 300 and 1000 lux if the need is to test at the level where illuminance has minimal influence on performance; illuminance should be reported; time limits should be set between 1 and 2 minutes; repeat testing (beyond the specified test and one retest) should be carried out only with authorization; and initial and repeated results should be reported. A set of test instructions to assist in the consistent application of the test is provided in the Appendix.

Can the Farnsworth D15 Color Vision Test Be Defeated through Practice?

Test time affects Farnsworth D15 outcomes in practiced, but not unpracticed, subjects with color vision deficiency

Limitations and Precautions in the Use of the Farnsworth-Munsell Dichotomous D-15 Test

Validation of a New Digital and Automated Color Perception Test

Colour Vision Changes across Lifespan: Insights from FM100 and CAD Tests

Psychophysical Evaluation of Congenital Colour Vision Deficiency: Discrimination between Protans and Deutans Using Mollon-Reffin’s Ellipses and the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue Test

Clinical Color Vision Testing and Correlation With Visual Function

[Clinical Classification of Degree of Deficiency in Color Defectiveness: Simulations by Changing the Total Number of Caps or Saturation of Farnsworth Dichotomous Test D-15]

An Efficient Recoloring Method for Color Vision Deficiency Based on Color Confidence and Difference

Quantitative and Objective Diagnosis of Color Vision Deficiencies Based on Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials

Display color accuracy and the D15 color arrangement test: A modeling study

[The Clinical Application of Different Brightness and Different Saturation D-15 Tests].

A simple modification of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test for much faster assessment of color vision

Effect of Illumination on Colour Vision Testing with Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test: Customized Colour Vision Booth versus Room Illumination

A new computer-based Farnsworth Munsell 100-hue test for evaluation of color vision

The impact of display saturation on visual search performance in congenital colour vision deficiency

Rapid measurement and machine learning classification of color vision deficiency

Response of Patients with Color Vision Defects to Worth 4-Dot and Duochrome Tests

A Computer-Based Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue (CFM-100) Test in Pilots' Medical Assessments.

Effects of Contrast Sensitivity on Colour Vision Testing

The Effect of Color Vision Resolution on Intra-Oral Shade-Selection Accuracy.