"The nighttime might be the right time" for cardiovascular event prediction.

W. White
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.195594
IF: 9.8968
2012-07-01
Hypertension
Abstract:See related article, pp 34–42 The ability to ascertain circadian variability of blood pressure (BP) via ambulatory recording devices has led investigators to evaluate the importance of the components of the 24-hour profile, including the overall 24-hour mean, as well as the awake and sleep periods. For ≈30 years, BP monitoring researchers have become fascinated with the shape of the 24-hour curve and have classified patients according to the “dip” in the curve during sleep. Clinical terms such as “dipper,” “nondipper,” and “reverse dipper” (or “riser”) have evolved to include those people who decline by ≥10% during sleep, those who decline <10% but still have some reduction compared with their awake BP, and those who actually have a higher BP during sleep and/or supine periods than while awake.1 These defined patterns of circadian BP variation have also been related to target organ involvement in cross-sectional studies,2,3 as well as to cardiovascular outcomes in longitudinal cohort analyses.4,5 Two patterns of circadian BP variability have evolved as markers of excessive cardiovascular risk, those with higher than expected nocturnal BP (nondippers and reverse dippers)4–6 and those with a large early morning surge in BP, particularly in older people.7,8 In isolation, the findings from both patterns make pathophysiologic sense. A high nocturnal BP versus a lower nocturnal BP increases the BP burden in …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?