Phase-Field Modeling of Coupled Brittle-Ductile Fracture in Aluminum Alloys

Samad Vakili,Pratheek Shanthraj,Franz Roters,Jaber R. Mianroodi,Dierk Raabe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.13994
2022-04-29
Materials Science
Abstract:Fracture in aluminum alloys with precipitates involves at least two mechanisms, namely, ductile fracture of the aluminum-rich matrix and brittle fracture of the precipitates. In this work, a coupled crystal plasticity-phase field model for mixed ductile-brittle failure modes is formulated and used to investigate the effect of precipitate morphology and size distribution on damage evolution in aluminum alloys. A thermodynamically consistent framework for elastic and plastic work dissipation in the fracture process zone is used to formulate the coupled constitutive behavior for brittle and ductile damage, respectively. Representative Volume Elements (RVE) with varying particle morphology and orientation were generated and their uni-axial loading was simulated to assess the damage resistance of the different model microstructures. For critical energy release rate $G_c$ values of the aluminum matrix ranging from 4 to 8~Jm$^{-2}$ for single crystals and from 10 to 16~Jm$^{-2}$ for polycrystals, the model predicts a change in failure modes from particle debonding to cracking followed by ductile matrix failure. The change of particle failure mechanism as a result of increased $G_c$ is observed for both, single and polycrystalline model microstructures. For the case of particle debonding, microstructures with circular or ellipsoidal particles (with the major axis perpendicular to the loading direction) show a higher ductility and fracture work compared to the other studied cases. In the case of particle cracking, microstructures with ellipsoidal particles aligned parallel to the loading axis show a higher ductility and fracture work among the investigated cases. The simulations qualitatively reproduce the experimentally observed particle failure mechanisms (cracking and debonding) for two different matrix alloy classes (commercially pure and 2xxx alloys) reinforced with ceramic particles.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?