Abstract:Funding source: Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé Award Identifier / Grant number: Not applicable Research ethics: Not applicable. Informed consent: Not applicable. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest. Research funding: Prof. Maheux-Lacroix and Prof. Bujold hold research salary support from the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec-Santé. Data availability: Not applicable. 1. Meyer, JA, Silverstein, J, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Antoine, C. The effect of uterine closure technique on cesarean scar niche development after multiple cesarean deliveries. J Perinat Med 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0211. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 2. Antoine, C, Meyer, JA, Silverstein, JS, Alexander, J, Oh, C, Timor-Tritsch, IE. The impact of uterine incision closure techniques on post-cesarean delivery niche formation and size: sonohysterographic examination of nonpregnant women. J Ultrasound Med 2022;41:1763–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15859. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 3. Roberge, S, Demers, S, Girard, M, Vikhareva, O, Markey, S, Chaillet, N, et al.. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:507.e1–7.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 4. Hayakawa, H, Itakura, A, Mitsui, T, Okada, M, Suzuki, M, Tamakoshi, K, et al.. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:429–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340500430436. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 5. Roberge, S, Chaillet, N, Boutin, A, Moore, L, Jastrow, N, Brassard, N, et al.. Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;115:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 6. Bujold, E, Bujold, C, Hamilton, EF, Harel, F, Gauthier, RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1326–30. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.122416. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 7. Bujold, E, Goyet, M, Marcoux, S, Brassard, N, Cormier, B, Hamilton, E, et al.. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181e41be3. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 8. Guyot Cottrel, A. Essai CHORUS: comparaison de l'aspect échographique de la cicatrice de césarienne selon une fermeture utérine en un plan ou en deux plans . Paris, France: Faculté de médecine, Université Paris Descarte; 2011. Search in Google Scholar 9. Jastrow, N, Gauthier, RJ, Gagnon, G, Leroux, N, Beaudoin, F, Bujold, E. Impact of labor at prior cesarean on lower uterine segment thickness in subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:563.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.894. Search in Google Scholar PubMed 10. Algert, CS, Morris, JM, Simpson, JM, Ford, JB, Roberts, CL. Labor before a primary cesarean delivery: reduced risk of uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labor for vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1061–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e31818b42e3. Search in Google Scholar PubMed © 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Evaluation of incision healing status after transverse uterine fundal incision for cesarean delivery and postoperative pregnancy: a ten-year single-center retrospective study

Updated criteria for the approval of subsequent pregnancy after cesarean section with a transverse uterine fundal incision based on 17 years of experience

New ultrasonographic risk assessment of uterine scar dehiscence in pregnancy after cesarean section

Uterine rupture due to placenta percreta in the first trimester of a pregnancy subsequent to a transverse uterine fundal cesarean section: A case report

Parallel transverse uterine incisions, a novel approach for managing heavy hemorrhage and preserving the uterus: A retrospective cohort study for patients with anterior placenta previa and accreta.

Uterine rupture in the third trimester of a pregnancy subsequent to a cesarean section by transverse uterine fundal incision: A case report and literature review

Hysteroscopic examination and laparoscopic repair of uterine scar defect after cesarean section

The safety of pregnancy in short term after uterus scar forming

Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Treated Via Hysteroscopy-Assisted Laparoscopy

Subsequent pregnancy outcome after conservative treatment of a previous cesarean scar pregnancy

Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy

Impact of hysterotomy closure technique on subsequent cesarean scar defects formation: a systematic review

Comparison of Three Different Treatment Methods for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence: Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center.

The useage and evaluation of safety of the transvaginal multifetal reduction under the guidance of ultrasound

Meta‐analysis comparing different ultrasound detection methods to accurately assess wound healing and scar formation after caesarean section

Laparoscopic Uterine Arteries Ligation and Ectopic Gestational Tissue Excision in Cesarean-Scar Pregnancy after Initial Treatment Failure

Optimal closure of the uterus during cesarean section: beyond the two layers

Ultrasonic assessment of cesarean section scar to vesicovaginal fold distance: an instrument to estimate pre-labor uterine rupture risk

In-hospital outcomes of repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture: A nationwide observational study

Clinial Study of the Treatment of Defect of Uterine Scar