Abstract:Objective: To investigate the relationship between the previous cesarean scar thickness, previous cesarean scar defect and the occurrence of uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section and to predict the occurrence of uterine rupture in the third trimester for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section by analyzing the lower uterine segment (LUS) situation or quantitatively measure LUS myometrium thickness. Methods: A total of 154 pregnant women who have a prior cesarean from January 2015 to March 2016 were selected, all of them regularly did the prenatal examination in the pregnancy period and finally gave birth in hospital. By the transvaginal sonograph, the LUS myometrium thickness (transverse and longitudinal thickness) and the size of the previous cesarean scar defect were measured in the first trimester, the LUS myometrium thickness (longitudinal thickness) and qualitatively analysis LUS condition were measured in the third trimester. They were divided into two groups according to the pregnancy outcome: uterine rupture group (found in the cesarean operation or during the pregnancy) and without uterine rupture group (including the vaginal delivery women and those without uterine rupture in the cesarean operation period). The sensitivity and specificity of LUS myometrium thickness in the first trimester and the qualitative analysis LUS situation, the quantitative measurement of LUS myometrium thickness in the third trimester were compared in the prediction of occurrence of uterine rupture (dehiscence or complete rupture). Results: The group without uterine rupture included 134 women (6 vaginal delivery and 128 cesarean delivery), and the group with uterine rupture included 20 women (all of them cesarean delivery). The LUS myometrium thickness in the third trimester in the group without uterine rupture was (1.6±0.5) mm, and was (1.1±0.7) mm in the uterine rupture group (P= 0.004). There were no significant difference between two groups in the mean value of age, height, weight, the interdelivery interval, the LUS myometrium thickness (transverse and longitudinal thickness) in the first trimester. Qualitative analysis of LUS condition had higher specificity (99%), higher positive predictive value (92%), higher negative predictive value (94%) and slightly lower sensitivity (60%) than quantitative measure of LUS myometrium thickness in predicting uterine rupture. Conclusions: Measurement of the LUS myometrium thickness in the first trimester is helpful for predicting the occurrence of uterine rupture, so it is not necessary to terminate the pregnancy because of the thin LUS or the little prior cesarean scar defect in the first trimester. However it should be paid close attention to the LUS situation during the whole gestation. Qualitatively analyzing LUS situation is more meaningful than quantitatively measuring LUS myometrium thickness in predicting the uterine rupture in the third trimester.

Ultrasonic assessment of cesarean section scar to vesicovaginal fold distance: an instrument to estimate pre-labor uterine rupture risk

LOWER UTERINE SEGMENT THICKNESS MEASUREMENT AND UTERINE SCAR INTEGRITY IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH PRIOR CESAREAN SECTION USING TWO-DIMENSIONAL TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND: A PROSPECTIVECONTROLLED STUDY IN SHARM INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL

Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery

[Correlation Between Uterine Scar Condition and Uterine Rupture for Pregnancy Women after Previous Cesarean Section].

Ultrasound evaluation of scar thickness for prediction of uterine dehiscence in term women with previous caesarean sections

Prediction of Delivery Complications by First‐Trimester Ultrasound Measurement of the Gestational Sac's Distance from a Previous Cesarean Section Scar

Analysis of high risk factors for complications in the trial of vaginal delivery due to uterine scarring in a subsequent pregnancy to a cesarean section.

New ultrasonographic risk assessment of uterine scar dehiscence in pregnancy after cesarean section

Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy

Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Series

Clinical Study on the Relationship Between Lower Uterine Segment Scar Thickness and Choices of Delivery Pattern of Women with Scarred Uterus Pregnancy

A Complex Obstetric Dilemma: Cesarean Scar Dehiscence

Does a Caesarean Section Scar Affect Placental Volume, Vascularity and Localization?

Caesarean Scar Defect: Risk Factors and Comparison of Evaluation Efficacy Between Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objective Analysis of Predictive Value of Ultrasound Quantitative Scoring System for Treatment Method Selection in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Biomechanical Modeling of Cesarean Section Scars and Scar Defects

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Successful Ultrasound-Guided Removal after Uterine Artery Ligation

Clinical value of ultrasonic indicators in predicting the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy after pregnancy termination

Delivery features of pregnant women with a uterine scar

Three‐Dimensional Volume Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Scar Niche and Cervix in Pregnant Women

Clinical analysis on related risk factors of uterine rupture of the scarred uterus