Hysteroscopic examination and laparoscopic repair of uterine scar defect after cesarean section

Jing-xin DING,Jian-liang CHEN,Hong-wei ZHANG,Wei-wei FENG,Xiao-fang YI,Xu-yin ZHANG,Zhi-Ling ZHU,Shao-feng ZHANG,Ke-qin Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2012.05.013

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To explore the possible pathogenesis of uterine scar defect after cesarean section, and to investigate the effect of laparoscopic surgical repair on the defect. Methods: Fourteen patients of uterine scar defect after cesarean section who underwent hysteroscopic examination and laparoscopic repair in Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University since Oct., 2009 were reviewed retrospectively and followed. Results: All the patients had a prolonged period, and the duration was (14.0±4.4) days (8-25 days), 4 cases had a history of infertility, and 4 cases complained of abdominal pain during menstruation. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) showed the width of the defect was (19.3±5.0) mm (13-30 mm), and the depth was (11.6±3.2) mm (5-19 mm), both significantly larger than thosed measured by trans-vaginal ultrasonic examination. The indications of cesarean section were uterine scar (previous section, 6 cases), premature rupture of fetal membranes (PROM, 3 cases), dystocia (3 cases), social factor (2 cases) and fetal distress (3 cases). In the previous cesarean section, the uterine was sutured by 1 layer of absorbable material in 7 cases, 2 layers in 4 cases, and unknown in the other 3 cases. Repair of the uterine defect was successfully achieved in all 14 patients. There was no intra-operative complications and none of the patients required blood transfusion. The mean operation time was (130±47) min (75-225 min), and the mean blood loss was (102±79) mL (30-300 mL). The cases was followed for an average of 4.1 months (2-12 months). In the 12 patients who had a recovery of menstruation, 11 patients had an obvious shortened period, and the duration was (8.6±3.2) days (6-10 days), and the clinic effective rate was 91.7% (11/12). Nine patients had trans-vaginal ultrasonic examination, and small defect was found in 2 patients (6 mm×2 mm and 7 mm×5 mm, respectively). Conclusions: HSG is better than transvaginal sonography to evaluate the defect before the surgery. Multiple cesarean section and PROM are the possible high risk factors of uterine scar defect after cesarean section. Laparoscopic surgical repair of the defect may be performed with satisfying effective rate.