Comparative analysis on pulverized coal combustion preheated by self-sustained purifying burner with coaxial and centrosymmetric air nozzle structures: Purification, combustion and NO x emission characteristics

Kun Su,Ziqu Ouyang,Hongshuai Wang,Hongliang Ding,Wenyu Wang,Qisi Chen,Shuyun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2024.09.017
IF: 3.8
2024-10-22
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering
Abstract:To optimize secondary air nozzle structure in purifying burner, this study focused on the comparison of purification, combustion and NO x emission characteristics of pulverized coal preheated by a 30 kW purifying burner with coaxial and centrosymmetric structures. Centrosymmetric structure shifted the position of main burning region down in high-temperature reduction unit (HTRU), and the number of branches differently influenced the temperature in different regions with this structure. For reductive gas components, CO concentration with centrosymmetric structure was higher compared to coaxial structure, while the differences in H 2 and CH 4 concentrations were smaller. Centrosymmetric structure was more disadvantageous to improve physicochemical properties of pulverized coal compared to coaxial structure, and this structure with four branches further deteriorated its properties compared to two branches. In mild combustion unit (MCU), the temperature at top was lower with centrosymmetric structure, while was higher in the rest. Centrosymmetric structure more effectively reduced NO x emission compared to coaxial structure, but with slight sacrifice of combustion efficiency ( η ). Moreover, both two-branch and four-branch centrosymmetric structures realized ultra-low NO x emission (<50 mg·m –3 ) with high η of over 98.50%, and the former was more advantageous. With this optimal structure, η and NO x emission were 99.25% and 40.42 mg·m –3 .
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?