An Inter-assessor Reliability Study on the Categorization and Staging of Pressure Injuries

Ayişe Karadaǧ,Vildan Çakar,Ayşe Sılanur Demir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.09.009

IF: 3.374

2024-10-01

Journal of Tissue Viability

Abstract:Highlights • Effective management of pressure injuries begins with accurate assessment, categorization/staging. • Relying solely on photographs for categorizing /staging of pressure injuries is insufficient, and incorporating patient information is crucial for accurate diagnosis. • The study emphasizes the challenges in accurately categorizing/staging pressure injuries in healthcare settings and the importance of continuous nurse training from undergraduate to postgraduate levels. Background The first step in effective management of pressure injuries (PIs) is to assess, categorize and stage correctly. Purpose This study aims to examine the agreement regarding the classification and staging of PIs among nurse academicians working on chronic wounds and with different stage of expertise. Methods Three nurse academicians were assigned as assessors according to Benner's stages of clinical competence (Competent, Proficient, and Expert). The assessors independently evaluated PIs photographs (n = 694). The assessors then met for the wounds where there was disagreement, and a Consensus agreement was reached. Kappa Statistics analysed the agreement between two assessors; Fleiss Kappa Statistics analysed the agreement between Competent, Proficient, Expert, and Consensus. Results Statistically, almost perfect agreement was obtained between Competent, Proficient, Expert, and Consensus assessments, respectively (Ƙ= 0.871; p<0.001, Ƙ= 0.842; p<0.001, Ƙ= 0.937; p<0.001). The highest agreement between the assessors were Unstageable PIs, Deep Tissue PIs, and Stage 3 PIs respectively. The most common disagreements were between Deep Tissue PIs and Stage 1 PIs, and between Deep Tissue PIs and Stage 2 PIs. Conclusion In the study, it was found that the categorization, and staging of PIs had varying degrees of reliability among the assesors, although at a statistically acceptable level.

dermatology,nursing