User-Adapted Plan Recognition and Shared Control for Wheelchair Driver Assistance under Unvertainty (Geïndividualiseerde planherkenning en gedeelde controle voor navigatiehulp aan rolstoelgebruikers op basis van onzekere metingen) ; User-Adapted Plan Recognition and Shared Control for Wheelchair Dri

E. Demeester

2007-05-24

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Insights into pressure injury prevention: Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Palestinian nursing students

Bahaaeddin M. Hammad,Faeda A. Eqtait,Ahmad J. Ayed,Basma S. Salameh,Imad H. Fashafsheh,Mohammad Y.N. Saleh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.03.011

IF: 3.374

2024-03-20

Journal of Tissue Viability

Abstract:Highlights • Nursing students in this study displayed inadequate knowledge but positive attitudes and to somewhat unsafe practice towards pressure injury prevention. • Higher education levels and diverse clinical experiences were significantly linked to increased knowledge, positive attitudes, and the implementation of preventive practices for pressure injuries among student nurses. • Implementing a holistic strategy is necessary to enhance the understanding of pressure injury prevention and management among Palestinian nursing students. Aim To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Palestinian nursing students towards pressure injury prevention. Materials and methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 455 nursing students recruited from Arab American University-Palestine, employing a total population sample. Data collection forms include socio-demographic information, the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool, Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument and Pressure Injury Preventive Practices scale. Results The study found that students had a mean knowledge score of 54% (14.04/26), a positive attitude score of 75.8% (39.42/52), and demonstrated a fair level of practice 75.3% (30.12/40). Significant differences were observed in the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice total scores, linked to academic year, clinical experience, and the number of attended departments during clinical training (p < 0.001). Additionally, weak but significant positive relationships were found between practice and attitude scores (r = 0.303, p < 0.001), practice and knowledge score (r = 0.211, p < 0.001), and a moderate positive significant relationship between knowledge and attitude scores (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). Conclusion The study revealed insufficient knowledge, positive attitudes, and somewhat unsafe practices among nursing students regarding pressure injury prevention. It highlights the need for specific revisions in the nursing curriculum. Improvements can be achieved through detailed coverage in classrooms and laboratories, integrating simulation methods. Additionally, ensuring that students gain adequate experiences in clinical units, with a specific emphasis on pressure injury prevention, is crucial for improving students' capability and contribute to better pressure injury management.

dermatology,nursing
Knowledge and Attitude of Nursing Interns Toward Pressure Injury Prevention in Saudi Arabia: A Multiregional Cross-Sectional Study

Hassan Al Gharash,Abdulhafith Alharbi,Yousef Alshahrani,Ola Mousa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241251631

2024-05-06

Abstract:Introduction: Nursing students in internship programs can play a role in preventing pressure injuries as they engage in real clinical situations and are assigned to conduct clinical tasks. Thus, nursing students in internship programs should be adequately prepared in terms of their knowledge and attitudes to contribute to pressure injury prevention. Objective: To explore and understand the knowledge and attitudes of nursing interns toward pressure injury prevention in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 161 nursing interns from various public hospitals across three provinces in Saudi Arabia and used an online questionnaire. The Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool and Attitude toward Pressure Ulcer Prevention instrument were used to collect data from nursing students in the internship program. The Statistical Package of the Social Sciences Program version 28 was used for the data analysis. Results: Participants reported inadequate knowledge regarding the prevention of pressure injuries, with a mean knowledge score of 48.15%. Additionally, the participants showed unsatisfactory attitudes toward the prevention of pressure injuries, with a mean score of 61.36%. Significant differences were observed in knowledge (P = 0.008) and attitude (P < 0.001) levels between sexes, with female participants scoring higher than male participants. Additionally, students who completed longer internships had better knowledge levels than those who completed shorter internships (P = 0.007). In the open-response question, participants reported a lack of preparation and support during the internship and suggested recommendations to address these deficiencies in preparation and support. Conclusion: Nursing interns need pre-internship preparation and continuous learning and support during the internship to manage and prevent pressure injuries.
[Septicemia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the course of a tuberculous primary infection].

M. Dreyer,H. Ferńandez,A. Bonfante

1960-05-27

Abstract:
Pressure Injury Prevention: Knowledge and Attitudes of Iranian Intensive Care Nurses

Batool Tirgari,Leili Mirshekari,Mansooreh Azzizadeh Forouzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.asw.0000530848.50085.ef

2018-04-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are the third most expensive condition after cancer and cardiovascular disease. Nurses are responsible for the direct and continuous care, treatment, and prevention of pressure injuries. To achieve optimal quality care, nursing knowledge and attitudes must be based on the best scientific evidence. This study aimed to examine the knowledge and attitudes of nurses working in intensive care units of hospitals affiliated with Zahedan Medical Sciences University regarding the prevention of pressure injuries.METHODS: This was a descriptive analytic study involving 89 critical care nurses. Data analysis was conducted using a 3-part questionnaire: demographic data, knowledge, and attitudes of intensive care nurses toward the prevention of pressure injuries. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS version 19 (IBM, Armonk, New York), using descriptive and inferential statistics (such as Pearson correlation coefficient, independent t test, and analysis of variance).RESULTS: The results showed that the mean ± SD score of pressure injury knowledge was 0.44 ± 0.12, and the attitude of participants toward pressure injury prevention was 2.69 ± 0.47. Scores varied widely; "nutrition" showed the highest mean score (0.71 ± 0.45), but "etiology and development" (0.42 ± 0.21) and "classification and observation" (0.42 ± 0.24) showed the lowest mean scores. Of the different aspects of attitudes toward pressure injury prevention, "the impact of pressure injuries" showed the highest mean score (2.95 ± 0.56), and "confidence in the effectiveness of prevention" showed the lowest mean score (2.56 ± 0.46). A statistically significant relationship was observed between pressure injury knowledge and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention (P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: Pressure injury prevention is one of many nursing care priorities and is a key indicator of the quality of nursing care. In order to achieve optimal quality care in this area, nurse managers and other administrators should make efforts to improve nursing knowledge and attitudes based on the latest scientific evidence for pressure injury prevention.

dermatology,nursing,surgery
Determination of Knowledge of Nurses Working in Surgical Clinics on Preventing Pressure Injuries

Zehra BAŞAYAR,Gülay YAZICI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1167340

2022-08-31

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi

Abstract:Aim: This study was conducted to determine the knowledge of nurses working in surgical clinics about pressure injuries, prevention, and treatment. Material and Methods: The research sample consisted of 360 nurses working in surgical clinics in a public hospital in Ankara. In the data collection, forms prepared by the researcher by reviewing the literature and taking current guidelines as a source, containing questions to determine the socio-demographic characteristics of nurses and their level of knowledge about pressure injuries, were used. The data were analyzed by number, percentile, Kruskal Wallis H test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The average score of nurses taken from the questions about pressure injuries was found as 51.98±14.52. It was seen that the themes in which average scores are lowest are etiology and risk factors, and the themes in which average scores are highest are treatment and care. It was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the age, gender, education level, and previous education about pressure injury and the knowledge score averages of the nurses. Conclusion: In preventing pressure injuries, one of the health care quality indicators, nurses' knowledge and ability to identify risk factors are directly effective in prevention, treatment, and care. In parallel with the developments in science and technology, it is recommended to review the current literature on this subject, organize in-service training programs based on current guidelines, encourage nurses’ participation in courses or certificate programs, and inform them about in-house policies and procedures.
Nursing students' perceptions and experiences in pressure injury risk assessment: A qualitative study

Özlem Arıburnu,Fatoş Korkmaz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104039

Abstract:Aim: This study aims to capture the perspectives of senior undergraduate nursing students concerning pressure injury risk assessment, shedding light on their practical experiences and insights. Background: Pressure injuries pose a significant challenge in healthcare, demanding vigilant attention from healthcare professionals. Central to mitigating this challenge is the imperative role of risk assessment, placing nurses at the forefront of prevention strategies. Given the critical nature of this responsibility, the need for a robust and well-structured integration of risk assessment teaching within undergraduate nursing education becomes increasingly apparent. Design: This study was conducted as a descriptive qualitative study. Method: This research was conducted at the Nursing Faculty of a State University in Ankara/Turkey, involving 19 senior students enrolled in the nursing program. Data was collected online using in-depth interviews with semi-structured interview questions between November and December 2022. After data collection, transcripts were generated and subjected to thematic analysis. The study was reported following the COREQ Checklist. Results: The study revealed two overarching themes: Opinions and Experiences. Within the Opinions theme, subthemes emerged, including "Features of Teaching," "Pressure Injury Definition," and "Improving Teaching Methods." The Experiences theme encompassed sub-themes such as the "Limited Relationship between Theoretical Teaching and Clinical Practice" and "Assessing the Risk of Pressure Injury in Practice." Conclusion: Participants affirmed that theoretical instruction sufficiently addressed pressure injury risk assessment yet expressed concerns about the inadequacy of clinical teaching. Additionally, they underscored the need for innovative teaching methods in the theoretical instructional process.
Assessment of pressure injury knowledge using PZ-PUKT questionnaire among Indian nurses and the evaluation of impact of an educational intervention on the knowledge scores: A quasi-experimental study

Anne Mary John,Keerthan Ranga Nayak U,Gracy Lobo,Megha Thaleppaddy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.02.002

IF: 3.374

2024-02-01

Journal of Tissue Viability

Abstract:AIM: To determine the knowledge of pressure injury among Indian nurses using PZ-PUKT questionnaire and to evaluate the effect of an educational intervention on knowledge scores.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Quasi-experimental study design was used to test the Pressure injury knowledge of 273 nurses in a tertiary care teaching hospital. The Pieper Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test questionnaire was given as a pre-test prior to education session and re-administered after the activity was completed.RESULTS: The mean score of the pre-test was 48.58 ± 6.75 (C·I 47.8-49.4) and post-test 54.14 ± 7.69 (C·I 53.3-55.1), which showed a statistically significant improvement. In the pre-test, nurses had highest score in the prevention subset while wound subset had the greatest improvement in the post-test. Female participants had a better understanding about Pressure injuries when compared to males. Also, the Assistant Nursing Superintendents and ward in Charge nurses had better knowledge as compared with other nurses.CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of pressure injury among nurses is limited. Knowledge deficits should be identified and targeted educational interventions should be administered to all the nurses irrespective of their educational level and work experience. Wound certification courses should be instituted so that it gives the nurses a better opportunity to learn about pressure injuries at a certified level. All nurses should undergo periodic training in this ever-evolving field so as to provide the best care to their patients.

dermatology,nursing
Knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure injuries among assistant nurses in a clinical context

Charlotte Bjurbo,Elisabeth Wetzer,David Thunborg,Li Zhang,Lisa Hultin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14950

2024-06-26

International Wound Journal

Abstract:This study aimed to evaluate assistant nurses' knowledge of and attitudes towards pressure injuries in a clinical setting. It employed a cross‐sectional design, using two validated surveys: PUKAT 2.0 and APUP, alongside open‐ended questions. A convenience sample of 88 assistant nurses from five wards across two departments at a 600‐bed university hospital in Sweden participated. Participants answered the questionnaire and open‐ended questions, followed by a learning seminar led by the study leader covering PUKAT 2.0 knowledge questions. The seminar ended with an evaluation of this training approach. Results revealed a significant knowledge gap in pressure injury prevention among assistant nurses, with a mean PUKAT 2.0 knowledge score of 33.8 and a standard deviation of ±11.7 (a score of 60 is deemed satisfactory). Only 3.4% (n = 3) of participants achieved a satisfactory knowledge score. However, attitudes towards pressure injury prevention, assessed by the APUP tool, were generally positive among the majority of the participants. Open‐ended questions and evaluations of the seminar showed assistant nurses' desire for pressure injury prevention training and their appreciation for the seminar format. Further studies need to evaluate recurrent training procedures and departmental strategies aimed at reducing the knowledge gap among healthcare staff.

dermatology,surgery
Evaluating Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention: A Descriptive Study

Hakan Dokumuş,Ezgi Dirgar,Betül Tosun,T. Bülbül

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000820108.14315.71

IF: 2.3729

2022-04-01

Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Abstract:ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate nurses’ knowledge on pressure injury (PI) prevention. METHODS Four hundred six nurses in Turkey participated in this descriptive study between January and February 2020. Participants completed an information form and the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Assessment Instrument (PUPKAI). The PUPKAI contains 26 items across six themes: (1) development, (2) classification and observation, (3) risk assessment, (4) nutrition, (5) interventions to reduce the amount of pressure/rupture, and (6) interventions to reduce the duration of pressure/rupture. RESULTS The mean age of the nurses was 26.93 ± 6.72 years. The mean total PUPKAI score was 11.80 ± 3.28. Almost all participants (91.6%) had insufficient knowledge on PI prevention. Male nurses scored higher on themes 1 and 2 than female nurses (P = .046, P = .029, respectively). Nurses with a postgraduate degree scored higher in total and on themes 2, 3, 5, and 6 (P = .001, P = .006, P = .011, P = .044, P = .029, respectively), and nurses with more than 10 years of service scored higher in total and on themes 4, 5, and 6 (P = .001, P = .002, P = .001, P = .026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The nurses who participated in this study do not have enough knowledge on PI prevention.

Medicine
Pressure Injury Knowledge and Attitudes of Senior Nursing Students

Hatice Eda Yoltay,Esma Özşaker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/asw.0000000000000088

IF: 2.3729

2024-01-01

Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Abstract:ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To describe the pressure injury (PI) knowledge and attitudes of senior nursing students (SNSs). METHODS This study used a descriptive and cross-sectional design. The study population consisted of SNSs involved in a nursing program in the Aegean region of Turkey. The authors collected data using a student information form, the Turkish version of the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention instrument, and the Turkish version of the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Assessment Instrument. RESULTS One hundred seventy SNSs were included; 50% had experience preventing PI, 14.1% had provided care to patients with PIs, and 21.2% had staged PIs. The SNSs’ average PI prevention knowledge score was 13.06 ± 2.94 (50.3% correct), and only 20.5% (n = 35) of the SNSs answered questions at an acceptable proficiency level (60%). The mean Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention score of the SNSs was 39.38 ± 2.73 (75.7% correct). CONCLUSIONS The results of the research indicated that the SNSs’ knowledge about preventing PI was insufficient, although their attitudes toward PI prevention were positive. Because adequate training on PI is important for patient care, students’ knowledge deficiencies regarding PIs should be identified and addressed.

dermatology,nursing,surgery
Australian Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Cross-sectional Survey

Paul Fulbrook,Petra Lawrence,Sandra Miles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000508

2019-10-07

Abstract:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess nurses' knowledge of pressure injuries in order to gather benchmark data, identify knowledge gaps, and based on results, implement educational strategies to improve practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey . SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The study setting was a large Australian tertiary general hospital employing approximately 2500 nurses in both full-time and part-time roles. A proportional sample (25%) stratified by experience, preparation, and facility-generated categories (nursing grade) was generated. The sample included nursing students and nursing assistants. Three hundred six participants completing the survey . INSTRUMENT: The Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test (PZPUKT) version 2, comprising 72 statements, with 3 subscales ( prevention /risk, staging, and wound description) was used to measure pressure injury knowledge . Item responses are "True," "False," and "Don't know." For the purpose of analyses, correct responses were scored 1, and incorrect or "don't know" responses were scored 0. Generally accepted ranges of scoring for the original PZPUKT specify less than 70% as unsatisfactory, 70% to 79.9% as satisfactory, 80% to 89.9% as good, and 90% and greater as very good knowledge of pressure injury prevention . METHODS: The survey was advertised throughout the hospital by strategically placed posters, computer screen savers within the hospital, and e-mails. Respondents completed paper-based questionnaires and data were manually entered online. Data were collected between September 2015 and October 2016. Descriptive and nonparametric inferential statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U , Kruskal-Wallis H ) were used to analyze within sample differences in scores. RESULTS: The overall mean knowledge score was 65%; approximately two-thirds of the sample (68%) scored 60% and greater, reflecting an unsatisfactory knowledge level of pressure injury prevention according to the original PZPUKT scores. The lowest mean scores were found in the "wound description" subscale. Participants who sought pressure injury information via the Internet or had read pressure injury guidelines scored significantly higher than those who did not ( P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). Seventeen items were answered incorrectly by over half of participants, identifying important knowledge deficits, particularly within the wound description subscale. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with results from studies using the PZPUKT, we contend that a cutoff score of 60% and greater (instead of ≥70%) should be used to indicate an overall satisfactory score. Our results identified deficits in pressure injury knowledge related to seating support and seated individuals and wound dressings as areas where nurses would benefit from focused education strategies.
Evaluating the Knowledge Levels and Attitudes Regarding Pressure Injuries among Nurses in Turkey

Seda Şahan,Sevil Güler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/asw.0000000000000195

IF: 2.3729

2024-08-30

Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Abstract:Pressure injuries (PIs) adversely affect patients' quality of life and can result in mortality and morbidity. 1 Although guidelines have been established for PI prevention, they remain a significant healthcare challenge. 2–4 Pressure injuries negatively affect patients physically, socially, and psychologically. Moreover, PIs cause significant increases in costs in the healthcare system. 3

dermatology,nursing,surgery
Australian First-Year Nursing Student Knowledge and Attitudes on Pressure Injury Prevention: A Three-Year Educational Intervention Survey Study

Carey Mather,Angela Jacques,Sarah J. Prior

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12030042

2022-06-22

Nursing Reports

Abstract:Pressure injury prevention is a significant issue as pressure injuries are difficult to heal, painful, and create clinical complications for patients. The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes of first-year nursing students to pressure injury prevention, and to explore whether additional educational interventions augmented learning. A previously validated online survey was administered to three cohorts of first-year nursing students in 2016, 2017 (after additional online education), and 2018 (after further simulation education), and a subsequent comparative analysis was undertaken. Overall, the knowledge of students about pressure injury was low with measures to prevent pressure injury or shear achieving the lowest score (<50%). Students aged over 25 years (p < 0.001) and men (p = 0.14) gained higher attitude scores. There were significant differences for mean knowledge scores between the 2016 and 2018 cohorts (p = 0.04), including age group (p = 0.013) and number of clinical training units undertaken (p = 0.23). The 2016 cohort scored consistently lower in the attitude survey than both other cohorts (p < 0.001). Online resources and simulation experiences marginally improved knowledge and improved attitudes towards prevention of pressure injury. Nursing curricula should include targeted education to ensure student nurses are adequately prepared to prevent pressure injury through understanding of aetiology and risk assessment.
Nurse knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to pressure injuries: A cross-sectional study in an Australian metropolitan teaching hospital

Linda Coventry,Amanda Towell-Barnard,Joelle Winderbaum,Nicole Walsh,Mark Jenkins,Dimitri Beeckman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.10.003

Abstract:Background: Pressure injuries are associated with significant clinical complications with negative effects on the patient's emotional, psychological, social and physical wellbeing. However, in Australia little is known about the knowledge and attitudes of nurses towards hospital-acquired pressure injuries. Objective: To determine nurse knowledge and attitudes towards hospital-acquired pressure injuries and to identify barriers towards prevention. Methods: A cross-sectional study following the STROBE statement was conducted between May to July in 2017. All nurses at a major metropolitan teaching hospital in Western Australia were invited to participate. Nurse knowledge and attitude to pressure injury were assessed using validated Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment tool, and Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention tool. An open-ended question asked about the barriers to pressure injury prevention. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and answers for the open-ended question were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Data from 224 nurses (response rate 19.0 %) were analysed. While nurses displayed a satisfactory attitude towards hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention, most nurses lacked adequate knowledge of the stages, causes and prevention of pressure injuries. Thematic analysis of responses to the open-ended question yielded two main themes: modifiable barriers to pressure injury prevention were lack of knowledge, attitude of pressure injury prevention and the scarcity of resources. Non-modifiable barriers to pressure injury prevention were the nursing environment and patient characteristics. Conclusion: Most nurses have satisfactory attitude towards pressure injury prevention, but inadequate knowledge about pressure injuries. Barriers to pressure injury prevention are attributed to nurse working environments, particularly impeded by staffing, time constraints and resources.
Risk Prevention for Pressure Ulcers

Elif KOPUZ,Anita Karaca,Anita KARACA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.563897

2019-06-30

Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences

Abstract:Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the levels of nurse’s knowledge on prevention of pressure ulcers and its associated factors.Methods: This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study. The research sample consisted of 250 nurses who worked at a training research hospital from 1 September to 1 December 2016. The research data were collected using the “Nurse Information Form” and “Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Survey” prepared in light of the literature.ResultsResults: The sample was mostly undergraduate (70.0%) and the mean age was 26.11±5.33 years. Nurses (98.8%) indicated that “advanced age” has a significant influence among risk factors that cause pressure ulcers. The item on the “Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Survey”, that was answered incorrectly most often (92.8%) was “when conscious patients with learning ability sit on chairs, they should be informed that they should shift their weight every 15 minutes,” in the sub-dimension of “Nursing Interventions for Preventing Pressure Ulcers”. There was a statistically significant difference between the knowledge level scores of nurses with respect to nurses’ age, education level, working unit and pressure ulcer education (p<0.05).Conclusion: Nurses’ knowledge level scores for prevention of pressure ulcers were above the average value. It is important to organize continuous education programs to increase nurses’ knowledge about the risk factors for pressure ulcers and their prevention.
Nurses' and nursing students' knowledge and attitudes to pressure injury prevention: A meta-analysis based on APUP and PUKAT

Jing Tian,Xiao Li Liang,Hong Yan Wang,Si Han Peng,Jun Cao,Shan Liu,Yan Min Tao,Xian Geng Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105885

IF: 3.906

2023-09-01

Nurse Education Today

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality among patients due to pressure injuries continue to rise. Nurses play a critical role in preventing pressure injuries. However, published results on nurses' knowledge and attitudes for pressure injury prevention are often contradictory.OBJECTIVES: To conduct a meta-analysis of nurses' and nursing students' knowledge and attitudes toward pressure injury prevention.DESIGN: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.DATA SOURCES: Ten databases were queried for the meta-analysis. The search period was from the time of the databases' establishment to February 2023.REVIEW METHODS: This review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Statistical analysis was conducted with the Stata 15.0 software, and the quantitative data of knowledge and attitude toward preventing PI in all studies were summarized.RESULTS: Thirteen studies from 9 countries were included. The meta-analysis showed that nurses and nursing students had low knowledge but positive attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled proportion of both knowledge and attitudes was higher in Asia than in Europe. Nurses had higher knowledge than nursing students, however, the former had a more negative attitude than the latter. Sensitivity analyses were robust. Egger's test showed no significant publication bias.CONCLUSION: The knowledge of nurses and nursing students about pressure injury prevention is not promising and there is an urgent need for continuous learning. Attitudes are more positive but there is room for improvement. The relevant departments should strengthen nurses' and nursing students' knowledge of pressure injury prevention and further improve their attitudes toward pressure injury prevention.

nursing,education, scientific disciplines
Effects of Web-Assisted Education on Nursing Students' Pressure Injury Knowledge Levels

Elçin Efteli,Saadet Çömez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/asw.0000000000000116

IF: 2.3729

2024-03-21

Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Abstract:Pressure injuries (PIs) are an important health problem frequently seen in individuals with acute or chronic diseases. 1,2 Although PIs are largely preventable, their care and treatment are difficult, long, and costly. They prolong the patient's duration of hospitalization, leading to increased care and treatment costs. Pressure injuries also lead to pain and infection; delay recovery; decrease the quality of life of the patient; cause loss of labor, activity, and earnings; and decrease the patient's self-esteem and body image. 2–5

dermatology,nursing,surgery
Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention Strategies: A Cross-Sectional Study in Nigeria

Iyabode Adetoro Gbadamosi,Oluwakemi KOLADE,Patience AMOO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.53713/nhsj.v3i2.236

2023-05-18

Nursing and Health Sciences Journal (NHSJ)

Abstract:The development of PUs consequently results in significant physical, financial, and emotional burdens on the affected patients and their relatives including healthcare providers. This study aimed to assess knowledge of pressure ulcer risk assessment (PURA) and prevention strategies among nurses at University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, Nigeria. A cross-sectional descriptive design among 264 nurses was selected through a simple random sampling technique using a structured pre-tested questionnaire for data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The level of significance is set at a p-value 0.05). Knowledge of pressure ulcer and prevention strategies was inadequate. Nurses need regular training programs to improve their knowledge and skills in PURA and the prevention of pressure ulcers among at-risk patients according to international best practices in order to bridge the previously identified gaps.
Pressure injury prevalence in critical care settings: An observational pre‐post intervention study

Bassam Alshahrani,Rebekkah Middleton,Kaye Rolls,Jenny Sim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2110

2024-02-01

Nursing Open

Abstract:Abstract Aim To explore pressure injury prevention practices and evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on PI prevalence before and after an educational intervention. Design A multi‐centre observational study. Method Data were collected at two time points in May 2021 and April 2022 using a Qualtrics® online form. Two Registered Nurses at each site collected observational data at each time point by diagnosing and staging any identified pressure injuries as part of a prevalence study. Patients admitted to participating units were included. Results A total of 181 patients in critical care units were included at the two‐time points. Pressure injury prevalence was 60.9% at the outset, with 52.9% hospital‐acquired, 37.9% unit‐acquired and 23.0% medical device‐related. Post‐intervention prevalence decreased significantly to 28.7%, including 21.3% hospital‐acquired, 14.9% unit‐acquired, and 8.5% medical device‐related. Pressure injuries were prominent in the sacral region, head area, and heels. Stages I and II pressure injuries were the most common. Increased age and longer ICU stays are linked to a heightened risk of pressure injury development in critically ill patients, whereas higher haemoglobin levels show an inverse relationship with the development of both pressure injury and severe stages in the univariate analysis. The predictive models revealed that increased age and longer ICU stays are predictors for both pressure injury development and progression to severe stages, while Braden scores predict the likelihood of developing severe stages of pressure injuries. Conclusions This study has identified a benchmark for pressure injury prevalence in critical care units in Saudi Arabia. The results demonstrate that pressure injuries can be prevented in critically ill patients when evidence‐based education strategies are implemented. Patient Care Impact Pressure injuries are an important issue for critically ill patients and can be prevented with proper investments. Strategies to prevent pressure injuries from admission will result in fewer pressure injuries. Reporting Method Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.

nursing
Protective Health Behaviors among Critical Care Nurses Concerning Pressure Ulcer Prevention for Hospitalized Patients at Baghdad Teaching Hospitals

Haider Majeed,Ahmed Fleih Hassan,Aqeel Habeeb Jasim,Ali Hussein Al-Ganmi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v5i.211

2023-09-05

Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 )

Abstract:Background: Pressure ulcers remain a serious complication for immobile patients and a burden for healthcare professionals. Objectives: To assess health behavior prevention among critical care nurses regarding pressure ulcer prevention for hospitalized patients and to find out the relationship between critical care nurses health behavior prevention and sociodemographic variables. Methods: A cross-sectional design study was carried out in critical care units at three teaching hospitals. The study period extended from November 1, 2022, to January 28, 2023. Non-probability purposive sampling, whose target population was 100 nurses who work in critical care units in Baghdad, Iraq. The data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The data was collected from November 10th through December 23rd, 2022. Study instruments consist of two parts. First, the demographic sheet included sociodemographic information about the participants. The second part includes nurses’ attitudes toward the pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP). The collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: Findings of the current study showed nearly three-quarters (74%) of critical care nurses had positive health behaviors regarding pressure ulcer prevention based on a total mean score of 2.26. Conclusion: This study concluded that the critical care units’ nurses surveyed in this study demonstrate an acceptable level of knowledge regarding pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. Continuing education or in-service training should be provided to enhance critical care units’ nurses’ practices and positive health behaviors about pressure ulcer prevention.

Insights into pressure injury prevention: Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Palestinian nursing students

Knowledge and Attitude of Nursing Interns Toward Pressure Injury Prevention in Saudi Arabia: A Multiregional Cross-Sectional Study

[Septicemia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the course of a tuberculous primary infection].

Pressure Injury Prevention: Knowledge and Attitudes of Iranian Intensive Care Nurses

Determination of Knowledge of Nurses Working in Surgical Clinics on Preventing Pressure Injuries

Nursing students' perceptions and experiences in pressure injury risk assessment: A qualitative study

Assessment of pressure injury knowledge using PZ-PUKT questionnaire among Indian nurses and the evaluation of impact of an educational intervention on the knowledge scores: A quasi-experimental study

Knowledge and attitudes regarding pressure injuries among assistant nurses in a clinical context

Evaluating Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention: A Descriptive Study

Pressure Injury Knowledge and Attitudes of Senior Nursing Students

Australian Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Cross-sectional Survey

Evaluating the Knowledge Levels and Attitudes Regarding Pressure Injuries among Nurses in Turkey

Australian First-Year Nursing Student Knowledge and Attitudes on Pressure Injury Prevention: A Three-Year Educational Intervention Survey Study

Nurse knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to pressure injuries: A cross-sectional study in an Australian metropolitan teaching hospital

Risk Prevention for Pressure Ulcers

Nurses' and nursing students' knowledge and attitudes to pressure injury prevention: A meta-analysis based on APUP and PUKAT

Effects of Web-Assisted Education on Nursing Students' Pressure Injury Knowledge Levels

Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment and Prevention Strategies: A Cross-Sectional Study in Nigeria

Pressure injury prevalence in critical care settings: An observational pre‐post intervention study

Protective Health Behaviors among Critical Care Nurses Concerning Pressure Ulcer Prevention for Hospitalized Patients at Baghdad Teaching Hospitals