Abstract:Abstract Over the past few decades, cities have repeatedly demonstrated high levels of ambition with regard to climate action. Global environmental governance has been marked by a proliferation of policy actions taken by local governments around the world to demonstrate their potential to advance climate change mitigation and adaptation. Leading ‘by example’ and demonstrating the extent of action that it is possible to deliver, cities have aspired to raise the ambition of national and international climate governance and put action into practice via a growing number of ‘climate change experiments’ delivered on the ground. Yet accounts of the potential of cities in global environmental governance have often stopped short of a systematic valuation of the nature and impact of the networked dimension of this action. This article addresses this by assessing the nature, and challenges faced by, urban climate governance in the post‐Paris era, focusing on the ‘experimentation’ undertaken in cities and the city networks shaping this type of governance. First, we unpack the concept of ‘urban climate change experimentation’, the ways in which it is networked, and the forces driving it. In the second and third parts of the article, we discuss two main pitfalls of networked urban experimentation in its current form, focusing on issues of scaling experiments and the nature of experimentation. We call for increased attention to ‘scaling up’ experiments beyond urban levels of governance, and to transformative experimentation with governance and politics by and in cities. Finally, we consider how these pitfalls allow us to weigh the potential of urban climate ambition, and consider the pathways available for supporting urban climate change experimentation.While the analytical conflation of sub‐state and non‐state actors is understandable in the context of the traditional focus of global governance research on nation states, we would like to gently point out that to scholars working on urban governance, equating a city with a non‐state actor such as a multinational corporation is incomprehensible and analytically useless. To push forward the research agenda, future work on climate governance should make clear distinctions between local governments and other actors from the outset.

Structure, agency and local climate governance: how do individual actors exploit local contexts to shape policymaking in smaller cities and towns?

Exploring the variances of climate change opinions in Germany at a fine-grained local scale

Policy implementation styles and local governments: the case of climate change adaptation

From Risk Governance to City–Citizen Collaboration: Capitalizing on individual adaptation to climate change

Deciding climate change adaptation implementation at the local level – a tale of two cities in the Netherlands

Ranking local climate policy: assessing the mitigation and adaptation activities of 104 German cities

Understanding the science-policy interface in urban climate governance from a co-production perspective: Insights from the cases of Hamburg and São Paulo

Local policy-making within the multilevel system: A study of governance in peripheral(ised) medium-sized cities undergoing socio-economic transformation in Saxony, Germany and Lower Silesia, Poland

Framing Europe on the local level – policy networks in German cities and their activities for political cohesion in Europe

Constructing climate change: Exploring how cities frame climate change in the Arctic

From commitment to action: a literature review on climate policy implementation at city level

Applying collective action frameworks to analyse local-level collaboration for electric vehicle-related policies

Dialogue and Disruption at the Doorstep: Participant Perceptions during a City Walk as a Climate Communication Format

Global urban climate governance in three and a half parts: Experimentation, coordination, integration (and contestation)

Situating C40 in the Evolution of Networked Urban Climate Governance

Data Scaling: Implications for Climate Action and Governance in the UK

The limits to the urban within multi-scalar energy transitions: Agency, infrastructure and ownership in the UK and Germany

Formal and Informal Governance Arrangements to Boost Sustainable and Inclusive Rural-Urban Synergies: An Analysis of the Metropolitan Area of Styria

Managing policy‐making in the local climate governance landscape: The role of network administrative organizations and member cities

CLIMATE‐JUST HOUSING: A Socio‐spatial Perspective on Climate Policy and Housing

Networking Cities after Paris: Weighing the Ambition of Urban Climate Change Experimentation