Can Auditor Change Improve Audit Quality for Listed Firms?From Experience of Repeat Restatement

Ma Che
Abstract:This study extends prior literature by examining the incidence of auditor change in the year following restatement announcement and whether auditor change is affected by restatement characteristics.We document a higher likelihood of auditor change in the twelve-month period following restatement announcement for restating firms than for non-restating firms in both univariate and multivariate tests.This evidence is consistent with the notion that firms aim to restore reputation following restatements.Looking closer,we document that number of years restated and number of accounting errors contained in one restatement report are positively related to the incidence of auditor change.We also found that although restatement direction and magnitude do not significantly affect auditor change,restatement magnitude is negatively related to the incidence of auditor change among firms with income-decreasing restatement,showing that firms with income-decreasing restatement are more concerned about magnitude when making decision about replacing auditors or not.Furthermore,we document that firms with auditor change following restatement announcement are more likely to experience repeat restatement of their financial statements audited by successor auditors in the period subsequent to the auditor change.This finding is consistent with the notion that audit quality for firms with auditor change experiencing restatement still remains low,difficult for them to regain credibility.
Business
What problem does this paper attempt to address?