Abstract:When considering hiring discrimination, scientific research typically considers 1 applicant characteristic at a time (such as the applicant’s gender or ethnicity), despite that applicants belong to various social groups (e.g., being a woman and belonging to an ethnic minority group). Moreover, the type of job one is applying for might further activate/inhibit stereotypical ideas about an applicant’s “fit” into that job position. The overall goal of this study was to investigate “double jeopardy” against Maghreb/Arab minority female applicants when they applied for a high-cognitive demanding job. Maghreb/Arabs are one of the largest ethnic minority groups in Belgium (where this study was conducted), who also suffer low labor market outcomes compared with other ethnic minorities and their native/Belgian counterparts. An experimental study was designed where 214 native/Belgian human resources (HR) professionals evaluated resumés of native/Belgian and equally qualified Maghreb/Arab applicants (female/male), who applied for either a high-cognitive demanding job (manager) or a low-cognitive demanding job (clerk). Our study shows indeed a double jeopardy problem regarding Maghreb/Arab female applicants when they applied for the high-cognitive demanding job but not so when they applied for the low-cognitive demanding job. Given that all applicants were equally qualified for the job positions studied, HR professionals’ job suitability perceptions seemed to be affected by job-irrelevant factors, namely applicants’ multiple group status. Yet, the type of job one was applying for seemed to trigger this. In sum, our study findings highlight the need for considering gender discrimination from a much more complex perspective, thereby taking into account other minority characteristics (like ethnicity) and job characteristics (like cognitive demands). This might better mirror reality and deepen our understanding of hiring discrimination in order to avert it. Studies on hiring discrimination typically consider 1 diversity dimension at a time. Building on a multiple categorization and cognitive matching perspective, this study investigated how applicants’ gender intersects with other status characteristics (ethnicity) and cognitive job demands for a better understanding of gender discrimination in resumé screening. An experimental study among 214 Belgian human resources professionals showed that a Maghreb/Arab female applicant received lower job suitability ratings compared with equally qualified native/Belgian female and Maghreb/Arab male applicants when they applied for a high-cognitive demanding job. No differences were found when they applied for a low-cognitive demanding job. Study findings point to the complexity of gender discrimination in hiring (i.e., resumé screening) as double jeopardy of ethnic minority women (i.e., Maghreb/Arab) may also depend on the type of job (i.e., cognitive demanding or not) one is applying for. We conclude with a critical reflection on findings, future research opportunities and implications for practice, like anonymous resumé screening.

Do ethnic, migration‐based, and regional language varieties put applicants at a disadvantage? A meta‐analysis of biases in personnel selection

Gender discrimination in hiring: Intersectional effects with ethnicity and cognitive job demands.

Do Large Language Models Discriminate in Hiring Decisions on the Basis of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender?

Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing

Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms

Language Experience Influences Sociolinguistic Development: The Role of Speaker Race and Language Attitudes on Bilingual and Monolingual Adults' Accent Processing

Potential bias when using social media for selection: Differential effects of candidate demographic characteristics, race match, perceived similarity, and profile detail

Accent Speaks Louder than Ability: Elucidating the Effect of Nonnative Accent on Trust

Dialect prejudice predicts AI decisions about people's character, employability, and criminality

Effects of gender sensitive language in job listings: A study on real-life user interaction

Using natural language processing to increase prediction and reduce subgroup differences in personnel selection decisions.

General mental ability testing and adverse impact in the United Kingdom: a meta-analysis with more than two million observations

Irrelevant Alternatives Bias Large Language Model Hiring Decisions

Do faces speak volumes? Social expectations in speech comprehension and evaluation across three age groups

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

Company norms affect which traits are preferred in job candidates and may cause employment discrimination

Does Ageist Language in Job Ads Predict Age Discrimination in Hiring?

Examining interviewer bias in medical school admissions: The interplay between applicant and interviewer gender and its effects on interview outcomes

Reducing Subgroup Differences in Personnel Selection Through the Application of Machine Learning

AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect

Applicant perceptions of selection methods for health professions education: Rationales and subgroup differences