Abstract:When considering hiring discrimination, scientific research typically considers 1 applicant characteristic at a time (such as the applicant’s gender or ethnicity), despite that applicants belong to various social groups (e.g., being a woman and belonging to an ethnic minority group). Moreover, the type of job one is applying for might further activate/inhibit stereotypical ideas about an applicant’s “fit” into that job position. The overall goal of this study was to investigate “double jeopardy” against Maghreb/Arab minority female applicants when they applied for a high-cognitive demanding job. Maghreb/Arabs are one of the largest ethnic minority groups in Belgium (where this study was conducted), who also suffer low labor market outcomes compared with other ethnic minorities and their native/Belgian counterparts. An experimental study was designed where 214 native/Belgian human resources (HR) professionals evaluated resumés of native/Belgian and equally qualified Maghreb/Arab applicants (female/male), who applied for either a high-cognitive demanding job (manager) or a low-cognitive demanding job (clerk). Our study shows indeed a double jeopardy problem regarding Maghreb/Arab female applicants when they applied for the high-cognitive demanding job but not so when they applied for the low-cognitive demanding job. Given that all applicants were equally qualified for the job positions studied, HR professionals’ job suitability perceptions seemed to be affected by job-irrelevant factors, namely applicants’ multiple group status. Yet, the type of job one was applying for seemed to trigger this. In sum, our study findings highlight the need for considering gender discrimination from a much more complex perspective, thereby taking into account other minority characteristics (like ethnicity) and job characteristics (like cognitive demands). This might better mirror reality and deepen our understanding of hiring discrimination in order to avert it. Studies on hiring discrimination typically consider 1 diversity dimension at a time. Building on a multiple categorization and cognitive matching perspective, this study investigated how applicants’ gender intersects with other status characteristics (ethnicity) and cognitive job demands for a better understanding of gender discrimination in resumé screening. An experimental study among 214 Belgian human resources professionals showed that a Maghreb/Arab female applicant received lower job suitability ratings compared with equally qualified native/Belgian female and Maghreb/Arab male applicants when they applied for a high-cognitive demanding job. No differences were found when they applied for a low-cognitive demanding job. Study findings point to the complexity of gender discrimination in hiring (i.e., resumé screening) as double jeopardy of ethnic minority women (i.e., Maghreb/Arab) may also depend on the type of job (i.e., cognitive demanding or not) one is applying for. We conclude with a critical reflection on findings, future research opportunities and implications for practice, like anonymous resumé screening.

Gender discrimination in hiring: Intersectional effects with ethnicity and cognitive job demands.

Whose misbehavior is inexcusable—And which one? Job‐related discrimination against ethnic minority and majority women

Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms

Do ethnic minorities have incentives to omit photographs from résumés? Experimental evidence from Germany and the Netherlands

Gender discrimination and the backlash effect in recruitment and dismissal processes: experimental evidence from Slovakia

Labour Market Disadvantages of Citizens with a Migration Background in Belgium: A Systematic Review

Do ethnic, migration‐based, and regional language varieties put applicants at a disadvantage? A meta‐analysis of biases in personnel selection

Age Discrimination in Hiring Decisions: A Factorial Survey among Managers in Nine European Countries

Mind the Job: The Role of Occupational Characteristics in Explaining Gender Discrimination

AI for hiring in context: a perspective on overcoming the unique challenges of employment research to mitigate disparate impact

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from a Cross-National Harmonized Field Experiment

Impression formation of majority and minority applicants during resume screening—Does processing more information reduce prejudice?

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

A mixed methods study of employers' and employees' evaluations of job seekers with a mental illness, disability, or of a cultural minority

Potential bias when using social media for selection: Differential effects of candidate demographic characteristics, race match, perceived similarity, and profile detail

Computer says 'no': Exploring systemic bias in ChatGPT using an audit approach

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Does the size of foreign population in a city affect the level of labour‐market discrimination against job applicants of migrant origin?

Examining potential gender bias in automated-job alerts in the Spanish market

Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI's "Eradication of Difference"