Grammar and Etymology in Moby-Dick
M. Bauerlein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ARQ.1990.0014
2014-04-02
Abstract:The words "call me ishmael" are not the fitst words of MobyDick. Before introducing his narrator and starting the nattative proper (a questionable category in this novel), Melville opens with the science of first words: "Etymology." The novel begins with an outline of the history of the word "whale," its derivation, definition, spelling, and, in the succeeding "Extracts" section, a chronicle of its usage from Genesis to Darwin, from the mythic to the mundane. Melville sets the term in the context of a dictionary entry, regarding the name fitst and foremost philologically, much as would the "late consumptive ushet" and the "sub-sub-librarian" whose portraits precede, respectively, the etymology of and allusions to the word "whale." The latter chronology does not, Melville notes, propose to set forth a "veritable gospel cetology," a series of authotitative statements intended to render the essential or symbolic nature of whales, but rather it offets an "entertaining" glimpse into "what has been promiscuously said, thought, fancied, and sung of Leviathan." That is, the list of quotations has less to do with the whale itself than with the way the whale has been variously and plurivocally represented. Similatly, the etymological citations confine themselves strictly to the term, not the
Linguistics,History